BizTalk Server Orchestration - Biztalk 2004 :: FTP correlation

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server Orchestration > March 2005 > Biztalk 2004 :: FTP correlation





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Biztalk 2004 :: FTP correlation
BA

2005-03-26, 7:56 am

For anyone which has tried this:

http://geekswithblogs.net/cyoung/ar...px?Pending=true

(excellent sample and very useful)



I'm trying to get something very similar to this example working for an FTP
receive port with flat files (so no message property correlation).

The problem is that the port is not dynamic and thus the port property for
<port>(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Address) cannot be modified, throwing the
compilation error:

<port> property 'Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Address' is read-only
for non-dynamic ports

Without being able to set the port property, I cant seem to get correlation,
how can I set this port?

Has anyone found a way past this snafu?


Scott Colestock

2005-03-29, 2:48 am

Is there anything preventing you from making this port dynamic to get the
behavior you would like/

Scott Colestock
www.traceofthought.net

"BA" <biztalk.architect@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4245324c$0$44074$5fc3050@dreader2.news.tiscali.nl...
> For anyone which has tried this:
>
> http://geekswithblogs.net/cyoung/ar...px?Pending=true
>
> (excellent sample and very useful)
>
>
>
> I'm trying to get something very similar to this example working for an
> FTP receive port with flat files (so no message property correlation).
>
> The problem is that the port is not dynamic and thus the port property for
> <port>(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Address) cannot be modified, throwing
> the compilation error:
>
> <port> property 'Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Address' is read-only
> for non-dynamic ports
>
> Without being able to set the port property, I cant seem to get
> correlation, how can I set this port?
>
> Has anyone found a way past this snafu?
>



Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com