|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server Orchestration > April 2005 > Master orchestration
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Master orchestration
|
|
|
| Newbie question:
Is it necessary to have to create multiple orchestrations for multiple
schemas when they are all essentially doing the same thing? For example, if
I want to have an orcehstration receive an XML file, forward said file to a
supplier, wait for a response and send the response back to a web service, do
I need to creat an orchestration for each different schema that this
involves?
Thank-you for your patience
| |
| Goutham Sukumar 2005-04-25, 8:47 pm |
| Aisha,
You would not create multiple orchestrations in this case. You can create
messages in the same orchestration of different types (schemas in your
case).
So you would typically have one orchestration that does all you mentioned.
When you are designing the orchestration, open the orchestration view in VS,
and under Messages node, create as many message variables as you need, each
potentially of a different schema.
-g
"Aisha" <Aisha@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AE135676-2CC6-433B-947D-1EB5B6E0AD33@microsoft.com...
> Newbie question:
>
> Is it necessary to have to create multiple orchestrations for multiple
> schemas when they are all essentially doing the same thing? For example,
> if
> I want to have an orcehstration receive an XML file, forward said file to
> a
> supplier, wait for a response and send the response back to a web service,
> do
> I need to creat an orchestration for each different schema that this
> involves?
>
> Thank-you for your patience
| |
| Scott Colestock 2005-04-25, 8:47 pm |
| Another option would be to receive messages of type XmlDocument (untyped
ports) - see Scott Woodgates discussion:
http://blogs.msdn.com/scottwoo/arch.../02/147120.aspx
and Stephen Thomas' sample.
You can use xpath expressions to route.
Scott Colestock
www.traceofthought.net
"Goutham Sukumar" <biztalkhelp@google.com> wrote in message
news:O5YOAxfSFHA.3664@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Aisha,
> You would not create multiple orchestrations in this case. You can create
> messages in the same orchestration of different types (schemas in your
> case).
> So you would typically have one orchestration that does all you mentioned.
> When you are designing the orchestration, open the orchestration view in
> VS, and under Messages node, create as many message variables as you need,
> each potentially of a different schema.
> -g
> "Aisha" <Aisha@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:AE135676-2CC6-433B-947D-1EB5B6E0AD33@microsoft.com...
>
>
| |
|
| Thank-you so much. That has helped immensly.
"Scott Colestock" wrote:
> Another option would be to receive messages of type XmlDocument (untyped
> ports) - see Scott Woodgates discussion:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/scottwoo/arch.../02/147120.aspx
>
> and Stephen Thomas' sample.
>
> You can use xpath expressions to route.
>
> Scott Colestock
> www.traceofthought.net
>
> "Goutham Sukumar" <biztalkhelp@google.com> wrote in message
> news:O5YOAxfSFHA.3664@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|