BizTalk Server Orchestration - Atomic transactions and actions

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server Orchestration > June 2005 > Atomic transactions and actions





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Atomic transactions and actions
STom

2005-05-05, 2:46 am

I have read in Scott Woodgates book the following (pertaining to atomic
transactions):

you cannot construct an atomic transaction with a request-response pair of
actions
you cannot have a Send and Receive shape the use the same correlation set

The book does not go on to explain why this is. Does anyone have an
explanation as to why the above limitations exist? Expecially the
correlation limitation, it looks like you would want to have the same
correlation set involved in an atomic transaction.

Thanks.

STom


Dejan Petkovic

2005-06-29, 7:52 am

This is because in the Atomic type of transaction messages are not sent
until orchestration riches the end.

Regards

"STom" <stombiztalker@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:O$0cG%23RUFHA.1796@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>I have read in Scott Woodgates book the following (pertaining to atomic
>transactions):
>
> you cannot construct an atomic transaction with a request-response pair of
> actions
> you cannot have a Send and Receive shape the use the same correlation set
>
> The book does not go on to explain why this is. Does anyone have an
> explanation as to why the above limitations exist? Expecially the
> correlation limitation, it looks like you would want to have the same
> correlation set involved in an atomic transaction.
>
> Thanks.
>
> STom
>



Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com