|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server Orchestration > March 2006 > Problem in Configuring Orchestration parameters
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Problem in Configuring Orchestration parameters
|
|
|
| Hi,
I have created Orchestration 'A' that receives and processes text file
from the location 'A-Input'.
My objective is to create a Generic Orchestration 'G', that could be
called from 'A/B/C/D' orchestrations. Before processing the text file
in 'A', I want to Call 'G' and pass over my text file message as an
Orchestration parameter. In G, I want to route this parameteric message
on to a suitable Output Location
'Output-A'/'Output-B'/'Output-C'/'Output-D' with the help of a Dynamic
Send Port.
1. I have created System.XML.XMLDocument type variable in 'A' and have
assigned my Input Message to it.
2. I have created System.XML.XMLDocument type variable in 'G' to
receive the message as a parameter from 'A'.
3. I have added Call Orchestration shape in 'A' and have referenced
'G'. The data types of variables in 'G' and 'A' are same but I am not
able to see the Orchestration Prameters in Call Orchestration
Configuration dialog box. Can anyone give me an idea on this.
Thanks,
Amit
| |
| Brennan O''Reilly 2006-02-26, 10:48 am |
| Hi Amit,
In orchestration "G" did you explicitly create an Orchestration Parameter or
did you only create a standard orchestration var? For the var to show up in
the call orchestration shape of orch "A" you must define an Orchestration
parameter in the orchestration being called and make sure that if your using
a var in Orch "A" that the orchestration parameter is also a var and not a
message. Let me know if that does not make sense.
-Brennan
--
Brennan O'Reilly
http://www.caffedharma.com/tech/
"Amit" wrote:
> Hi,
> I have created Orchestration 'A' that receives and processes text file
> from the location 'A-Input'.
>
> My objective is to create a Generic Orchestration 'G', that could be
> called from 'A/B/C/D' orchestrations. Before processing the text file
> in 'A', I want to Call 'G' and pass over my text file message as an
> Orchestration parameter. In G, I want to route this parameteric message
> on to a suitable Output Location
> 'Output-A'/'Output-B'/'Output-C'/'Output-D' with the help of a Dynamic
> Send Port.
>
>
> 1. I have created System.XML.XMLDocument type variable in 'A' and have
> assigned my Input Message to it.
> 2. I have created System.XML.XMLDocument type variable in 'G' to
> receive the message as a parameter from 'A'.
> 3. I have added Call Orchestration shape in 'A' and have referenced
> 'G'. The data types of variables in 'G' and 'A' are same but I am not
> able to see the Orchestration Prameters in Call Orchestration
> Configuration dialog box. Can anyone give me an idea on this.
>
> Thanks,
> Amit
>
>
| |
|
| Brennan,
I am passing a variable from A to G. In G I have created an
Orchestration variable parameter. The data type of the variables are
System.XML.XMLDocument.
I tested for a string variable and it worked fine but I am not sure why
its not working for a System.XML.XMLDocument variable type. The Call
Orchestration Shape's Configuration Dialog box displays-> "No Variables
of type Microsoft.XLANGs.RuntimeTypes.XMLDocumentSerializableProxy". I
am not sure what does this mean.
-Amit
| |
|
| Amit,
Ceate a message, get message assinment scope, assign the message that you
received from receive shape to the message varibale that you created, and
call orchestration.
Cheers,
Balu
"Amit" wrote:
> Brennan,
> I am passing a variable from A to G. In G I have created an
> Orchestration variable parameter. The data type of the variables are
> System.XML.XMLDocument.
>
> I tested for a string variable and it worked fine but I am not sure why
> its not working for a System.XML.XMLDocument variable type. The Call
> Orchestration Shape's Configuration Dialog box displays-> "No Variables
> of type Microsoft.XLANGs.RuntimeTypes.XMLDocumentSerializableProxy". I
> am not sure what does this mean.
>
> -Amit
>
>
|
|
|
|
|