|
Home > Archive > BizTalk Server Tools > February 2004 > XMLSPY
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
|
| anyone using xmlspy with biztalk? wondering if xmlspy is
a good addition to biztalk or is an unnecessary
purchase? the xmlspy salesman seems to think biztalk is
pretty useless w/o xmlspy.
any comments are appreciated
thanks,
lyle
| |
| R.Balaji 2004-02-13, 2:38 am |
| Hi,
I disagree with the salesman.
I have done many BizTalk integration projects without XMLSPY.
Though I like the xmlspy product, I don't think it is a mandatory tool for
BizTalk.
Regards,
R.Balaji
"lyle" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:fe2b01c3f247$58107820$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> anyone using xmlspy with biztalk? wondering if xmlspy is
> a good addition to biztalk or is an unnecessary
> purchase? the xmlspy salesman seems to think biztalk is
> pretty useless w/o xmlspy.
>
> any comments are appreciated
>
> thanks,
> lyle
| |
| Andres Felipe Arguello 2004-02-16, 10:36 am |
| That depends what kind of documents and maps do you going to use in the
project
For a Retail projects with the XML EANUCC v 1.3 docs, Biztalk server works
in a limited scenario, if you work with a complex documents or complex maps,
that need to be manipulated o developed by hand, then you need a tool like
xmlspy (xmlspy is the best tool in the market in the xml managment), but if
you work with simple specifications or simple maps then is a unnecesary
adition to biztalk server.
Another useful thing in xmlspy is the source code generation for .net or
java, that could generate the object model from a xml specification
Andres Felipe Argüello
EAI & B2B Developer
Cenet
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:fe2b01c3f247$58107820$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> anyone using xmlspy with biztalk? wondering if xmlspy is
> a good addition to biztalk or is an unnecessary
> purchase? the xmlspy salesman seems to think biztalk is
> pretty useless w/o xmlspy.
>
> any comments are appreciated
>
> thanks,
> lyle
|
|
|
|
|