|
Home > Archive > Application Center Administration > February 2004 > app center new site
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
app center new site
|
|
| Nathan 2004-02-08, 8:44 am |
| I have 2 Windows 2003 servers with App Center SP2 installed as a General/Web
cluster using NLB. I am going to be moving our intranet sites to this new
web cluster. A new intranet site that this cluster will host requires the
installation of COM+ applications. I know I can replicate these new COM+
apps but is it possible to load balance access. I don't have the resources
to create a separate COM+ application cluster.
What is the best method for setting up this new site?
Thank you
| |
| Andrés Naranjo[MSFT] 2004-02-08, 8:44 am |
| If you do not have the resources to create a separate cluster for the COM+
applications, then you cannot leverage COM+ Component Load Balancing (CLB),
so you can just run the COM+ applications on the web servers themselves.
Depending on the amount of load and the overhead of the COM+ applications,
this may be appropriate.
Does this answer your question? Thank you for using Microsoft Newsgroups!
Andrés Naranjo [MSFT]
Microsoft DS Communities Team
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Please reply to newsgroups only.
| |
| Nathan 2004-02-08, 8:44 am |
| Thank you, in a two node NLB will one of the servers end up taking all of
the COM+ application. Will it do any good to replicate the COM+ app to both
servers?
Thank you
"Andrés Naranjo[MSFT]" <andresnaOnline@online.microsoft.com.no.spam> wrote
in message news:wBjGN%232wDHA.3532@cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl...
> If you do not have the resources to create a separate cluster for the COM+
> applications, then you cannot leverage COM+ Component Load Balancing
(CLB),
> so you can just run the COM+ applications on the web servers themselves.
>
> Depending on the amount of load and the overhead of the COM+ applications,
> this may be appropriate.
>
>
>
>
> Does this answer your question? Thank you for using Microsoft Newsgroups!
>
> Andrés Naranjo [MSFT]
> Microsoft DS Communities Team
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> Please reply to newsgroups only.
>
| |
| Andrés Naranjo[MSFT] 2004-02-08, 8:44 am |
| Well, NLB is supposed to make sure that the load is somewhat evenly
distributed among the machines in the cluster, so the COM+ calls should be
occurring, in the long run, about as much on each of the two machines.
You do want to have the COM+ applications on both servers for this method
to work.
One thing you could do is to install COM+ proxies on the web servers, and
the proxies point to a separate server which would just run the COM+
applications. But this is not a COM+ load balancing method and is not a
replacement to CLB.
So, you're better off installing the COM+ applications on both web servers,
making sure you have single affinity set up in NLB, and then making sure
your users are not reporting problems maintaining sessions with the servers.
Does this answer your question? Thank you for using Microsoft Newsgroups!
Andrés Naranjo [MSFT]
Microsoft DS Communities Team
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Please reply to newsgroups only.
| |
| Nathan 2004-02-08, 8:44 am |
| That answers my question very well..thank you
"Andrés Naranjo[MSFT]" <andresnaOnline@online.microsoft.com.no.spam> wrote
in message news:%23Bhxo2ZxDHA.2604@cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl...
> Well, NLB is supposed to make sure that the load is somewhat evenly
> distributed among the machines in the cluster, so the COM+ calls should be
> occurring, in the long run, about as much on each of the two machines.
>
> You do want to have the COM+ applications on both servers for this method
> to work.
>
>
> One thing you could do is to install COM+ proxies on the web servers, and
> the proxies point to a separate server which would just run the COM+
> applications. But this is not a COM+ load balancing method and is not a
> replacement to CLB.
>
> So, you're better off installing the COM+ applications on both web
servers,
> making sure you have single affinity set up in NLB, and then making sure
> your users are not reporting problems maintaining sessions with the
servers.
>
>
> Does this answer your question? Thank you for using Microsoft Newsgroups!
>
> Andrés Naranjo [MSFT]
> Microsoft DS Communities Team
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> Please reply to newsgroups only.
>
|
|
|
|
|