|
Home > Archive > Application Center Administration > June 2004 > Adressing Mr George Cheng
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Adressing Mr George Cheng
|
|
|
| Hello!
I got one answer (thanks Ramiro) on my question ( se below ) now i would very much like to hear Micrsofts answer!
I just wondering if there are someone at Micrsoft who can say if there is some kind of solution of our problems!!???
We cant be the only one in the world that have costumers who is using a webmanager tool to update sites with.
We just have to ensure that they hit the same machine every time they updates theirs sites so that the updates dont
disapear next time replication occurs!
please!!!
Regards
Mike
"
Our costumer have a "web-manager" tool that they use to update there website.
The problem is that they sometime hit the master server and sometime the slave.
When they hit the slave server, the next time replication occurs the updates disapears.
Is there any way to ensure that you always hit the "master" server and not the "slave" server ?"
Regards /
Mike
| |
| George Cheng [MSFT] 2004-06-08, 12:01 am |
| I suppose you could add more IP addresses to the backend adapter of the
controller and then bind these to your websites, and then publish to those
IP's.
If you are able to change the port that you publish to, you could setup a
port rule for that port and set the weight to 100 for the controller and 0
for the member.
Thank You
George Cheng
Microsoft Application Center & Index Server Support
Note: This article has no warranties implicit or explicit.
All the content is given on the "as is" basis and the user
takes full responsibility for its use and assumption.
Microsoft Corporation Copyright 2004
All Rights Reserved
--------------------
| Thread-Topic: Adressing Mr George Cheng
| thread-index: AcRMcibMsGeSGfdcRoCHT7wU2Aas6w==
| X-WN-Post: microsoft.public.applicationcenter.admin
| From: "=?Utf-8?B?TWlrZQ==?=" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
| Subject: Adressing Mr George Cheng
| Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 02:31:03 -0700
| Lines: 23
| Message-ID: <999D0DC5-AB33-4CE1-B033-30422CD2F4BA@microsoft.com>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.applicationcenter.admin
| Path: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl
| Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl microsoft.public.applicationcenter.admin:5419
| NNTP-Posting-Host: tk2msftcmty1.phx.gbl 10.40.1.180
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.applicationcenter.admin
|
| Hello!
I got one answer (thanks Ramiro) on my question ( se below ) now i would
very much like to hear Micrsofts answer!
I just wondering if there are someone at Micrsoft who can say if there is
some kind of solution of our problems!!???
We cant be the only one in the world that have costumers who is using a
webmanager tool to update sites with.
We just have to ensure that they hit the same machine every time they
updates theirs sites so that the updates dont
disapear next time replication occurs!
please!!!
Regards
Mike
"
Our costumer have a "web-manager" tool that they use to update there
website.
The problem is that they sometime hit the master server and sometime the
slave.
When they hit the slave server, the next time replication occurs the
updates disapears.
Is there any way to ensure that you always hit the "master" server and not
the "slave" server ?"
Regards /
Mike
|
| |
|
| Thanks for your answer !
Regards!
Mike
|
|
|
|
|