|
Home > Archive > Web Servers on Unix and Linux > August 2005 > Defining a named worker with mod_jk2
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Defining a named worker with mod_jk2
|
|
| Henri Sivonen 2005-08-24, 6:03 pm |
| With mod_jk I did this in workers.properties to define a worker called
foo:
worker.list=other_workers, foo
worker.foo.port=8888
worker.foo.host=127.0.0.1
worker.foo.type=ajp13
How to do the equivalent thing in workers2.properties for mod_jk2?
(I could figure out workers.properties without docs but it appears
workers2.properties is too weird even with docs.)
--
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Mozilla Web Author FAQ: http://mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/faq.html
| |
| Juha Laiho 2005-08-25, 6:02 pm |
| Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> said:
>With mod_jk I did this in workers.properties to define a worker called
>foo:
....
>How to do the equivalent thing in workers2.properties for mod_jk2?
No help for this, except to point out that development of mod_jk2
has been frozen, and efforts are again directed to mod_jk. So,
unless you have some specific reason to use mod_jk2, just revert
back to mod_jk.
--
Wolf a.k.a. Juha Laiho Espoo, Finland
(GC 3.0) GIT d- s+: a C++ ULSH++++$ P++@ L+++ E- W+$@ N++ !K w !O !M V
PS(+) PE Y+ PGP(+) t- 5 !X R !tv b+ !DI D G e+ h---- r+++ y++++
"...cancel my subscription to the resurrection!" (Jim Morrison)
| |
| Henri Sivonen 2005-08-25, 6:02 pm |
| In article <dektfs$36s$1@ichaos.ichaos-int>,
Juha Laiho <Juha.Laiho@iki.fi> wrote:
> So,
> unless you have some specific reason to use mod_jk2, just revert
> back to mod_jk.
Choosing mod_jk over mod_jk2 is not in my bargaining power in this case.
Does mod_jk work with Apache 2.x?
--
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Mozilla Web Author FAQ: http://mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/faq.html
| |
| Juha Laiho 2005-08-26, 5:54 pm |
| Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> said:
>In article <dektfs$36s$1@ichaos.ichaos-int>,
> Juha Laiho <Juha.Laiho@iki.fi> wrote:
>
>
>Choosing mod_jk over mod_jk2 is not in my bargaining power in this case.
>Does mod_jk work with Apache 2.x?
I have stil been keeping with Apache 1.3.x, so no first-hand
experience there -- Google references indicate strongly that
mod_jk would work with Apache2. Also, reading the latest Tomcat
docs for a first time in a while, there is a mention of using
Apache2 with mod_proxy (apparently a separate add-on for
pre-2.2 Apache versions) with AJP protocol support enabled.
So looks like mod_proxy is extended to also handle Tomcat
connectivity.
--
Wolf a.k.a. Juha Laiho Espoo, Finland
(GC 3.0) GIT d- s+: a C++ ULSH++++$ P++@ L+++ E- W+$@ N++ !K w !O !M V
PS(+) PE Y+ PGP(+) t- 5 !X R !tv b+ !DI D G e+ h---- r+++ y++++
"...cancel my subscription to the resurrection!" (Jim Morrison)
|
|
|
|
|