This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Samba > June 2004 > [Samba] Cross subnet browsing





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author [Samba] Cross subnet browsing
Jason C. Waters

2004-06-30, 7:48 am

I'm having a hard time figuring this one out. I've done this before
when I had a PDC on one end of the VPN, and a BDC on the other. This is
what my setup looks like now.

Clients(XP)
|
PDC(192.168.0.4), windows 2000
|
|
WINS Server Samba(192.168.0.1), also the gateway for this network
|
|
Internet
|
|
WINS Server Samba(192.168.2.1), also the gateway for this network
|
|
Clients(XP)



With this setup I'm not sure how I'm suppose to setup each wins server.
Do I need to have one on each subnet, and then have them both remote
announce and remote browse sync to each other? Or maybe some like
that? When I'm using remote announce, should it be 192.168.0.1 or
192.168.0.0 or 192.168.0.255? Same with remote browse sync, does it
need to be the actual address of the other wins server? or do I just
send it to that subnet? Does anyone have a working configuration with
this setup(Domain on one side of the tunnel and just a workgroup on the
other, both are the same workgroup). All the machines can ping each
others ip, so I know its not a tunnel issue. Thanks for your guys help.

Jason

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Jason C. Waters

2004-06-30, 5:53 pm

Charles,
The clients behind each gateway, do they point to the local wins
server then? So for the clients on the 192.168.0.0 network, they would
point to 192.168.0.1, where samba is running a wins server and announces
to 192.168.2.255? You have wins server = 192.168.1.50, would I just
have wins
support = yes if its on the same machine? Let me clear up what I'm
trying to say.

Should my network look like this: Option A

Clients on network A(192.168.0.0) have a wins server of 192.168.0.1(the
vpn gateway for them as well as a samba wins server)
192.168.0.1(Samba wins server with these settings, wins support = yes,
remote announce = 192.168.2.255)
192.168.2.1(Samba wins server with these settings, wins support = yes,
remote announce = 192.168.0.255)
Clients on network B(192.168.2.0) have a wins server of 192.168.2.1(the
vpn gateway for them as well as a samba wins server)

Or this: Option B

Clients on network A(192.168.0.0) have a wins server of 192.168.0.1(the
vpn gateway for them as well as a samba wins server)
192.168.0.1(Samba wins server with these settings, wins support = yes,
remote announce = 192.168.2.255)
192.168.2.1(Samba wins server with these settings, wins server =
192.168.0.1, remote announce = 192.168.0.255)
Clients on network B(192.168.2.0) have a wins server of 192.168.2.1(the
vpn gateway for them as well as a samba wins server)

Or this: Option C

Clients on network A(192.168.0.0) have a wins server of 192.168.0.1(the
vpn gateway for them as well as a samba wins server)
192.168.0.1(Samba wins server with these settings, wins support = yes,
remote announce = 192.168.2.255)
192.168.2.1(Samba wins server with these settings, wins server =
192.168.0.1, remote announce = 192.168.0.255)
Clients on network B(192.168.2.0) have a wins server of 192.168.0.1(the
vpn gateway for them as well as a samba wins server)


Thanks for your help

Charles Hamel wrote:

>Hi Jason,
>
>I have a similar setup and all I need to do was to enable ip directed
>broadcast on the router and enter the following settings in smb.conf:
>
>wins server = 192.168.1.50
>remote announce = 192.168.1.255
>
>HTH
>
>Charles
>
>On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:23:18 -0400, Jason C. Waters wrote
>
>
>
>
>--
>Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Charles Hamel

2004-06-30, 5:53 pm

Jason,

Option A is the good way.

You could use remote browse sync according the the manpage since you only have
Samba servers. We have a mixed network here so it is not a solution. So your
configuration could be, anybody correct me if this is wrong :

For the 192.168.0.1 server :
remote browse sync = 192.168.2.1
wins support = yes


For the 192.168.2.1 server :
remote browse sync = 192.168.0.1
wins support = yes

The manpage doesn't mention that WINS is required for remote browse sync,
since it is based on the workgroup master browser. So maybe you don't need
WINS server at all.

Charles

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:53:02 -0400, Jason C. Waters wrote[vbcol=seagreen]
> Charles,
> The clients behind each gateway, do they point to the local wins
> server then? So for the clients on the 192.168.0.0 network, they
> would point to 192.168.0.1, where samba is running a wins server and
> announces to 192.168.2.255? You have wins server = 192.168.1.50,
> would I just have wins support = yes if its on the same machine?
> Let me clear up what I'm trying to say.
>
> Should my network look like this: Option A
>
> Clients on network A(192.168.0.0) have a wins server of
> 192.168.0.1(the vpn gateway for them as well as a samba wins server)
> 192.168.0.1(Samba wins server with these settings, wins support =
> yes, remote announce = 192.168.2.255) 192.168.2.1(Samba wins server
> with these settings, wins support = yes, remote announce =
> 192.168.0.255) Clients on network B(192.168.2.0) have a wins server
> of 192.168.2.1(the vpn gateway for them as well as a samba wins
> server)
>
> Or this: Option B
>
> Clients on network A(192.168.0.0) have a wins server of
> 192.168.0.1(the vpn gateway for them as well as a samba wins server)
> 192.168.0.1(Samba wins server with these settings, wins support =
> yes, remote announce = 192.168.2.255) 192.168.2.1(Samba wins server
> with these settings, wins server = 192.168.0.1, remote announce =
> 192.168.0.255) Clients on network B(192.168.2.0) have a wins server
> of 192.168.2.1(the vpn gateway for them as well as a samba wins
> server)
>
> Or this: Option C
>
> Clients on network A(192.168.0.0) have a wins server of
> 192.168.0.1(the vpn gateway for them as well as a samba wins server)
> 192.168.0.1(Samba wins server with these settings, wins support =
> yes, remote announce = 192.168.2.255) 192.168.2.1(Samba wins server
> with these settings, wins server = 192.168.0.1, remote announce =
> 192.168.0.255) Clients on network B(192.168.2.0) have a wins server
> of 192.168.0.1(the vpn gateway for them as well as a samba wins
> server)
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> Charles Hamel wrote:
>


--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Jason C. Waters

2004-06-30, 5:53 pm

I have it setup that way, with the clients behind each gateway to use
the gateway as their wins server. But I can't see them through my
network places. Any ideas? How long does it take to sync? Can I force
it to sync? Thanks for your help.

Jason

Charles Hamel wrote:

>Jason,
>
>Option A is the good way.
>
>You could use remote browse sync according the the manpage since you only have
>Samba servers. We have a mixed network here so it is not a solution. So your
>configuration could be, anybody correct me if this is wrong :
>
>For the 192.168.0.1 server :
>remote browse sync = 192.168.2.1
>wins support = yes
>
>
>For the 192.168.2.1 server :
>remote browse sync = 192.168.0.1
>wins support = yes
>
>The manpage doesn't mention that WINS is required for remote browse sync,
>since it is based on the workgroup master browser. So maybe you don't need
>WINS server at all.
>
>Charles
>
>On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:53:02 -0400, Jason C. Waters wrote
>
>
>
>
>--
>Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Charles Hamel

2004-06-30, 5:53 pm

Jason,

I have seen sync delays of a couple of hours. I don't know any way to force
it. I would suggest to increase the logging level of nmbd to 2 or 3 and tail
-f the nmbd.log file and see what you get.

Charles

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:28:16 -0400, Jason C. Waters wrote[vbcol=seagreen]
> I have it setup that way, with the clients behind each gateway to
> use the gateway as their wins server. But I can't see them through
> my network places. Any ideas? How long does it take to sync? Can
> I force it to sync? Thanks for your help.
>
> Jason
>
> Charles Hamel wrote:
>


--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Jason C. Waters

2004-06-30, 8:48 pm

Ok so I got it working on one side of the vpn. The 192.168.2.0 can see
all the machines on both sides, but the 192.168.0.0 side can't see the
machines in my network places. They are XP Pro machines incase that
makes a difference. The wierd thing is I can ping the machines by name
but can't see them in my network places. The 192.168.0.0 network has a
windows 2000 PDC. Any ideas? Thanks for your help.

Jason

Charles Hamel wrote:

>Jason,
>
>I have seen sync delays of a couple of hours. I don't know any way to force
>it. I would suggest to increase the logging level of nmbd to 2 or 3 and tail
>-f the nmbd.log file and see what you get.
>
>Charles
>
>On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:28:16 -0400, Jason C. Waters wrote
>
>
>
>
>--
>Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2010 webservertalk.com