| Arno Wagner 2007-07-30, 1:16 pm |
| In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Daniel James <wastebasket@nospam.aaisp.org> wrote:
> In article news:<uj4qa3hdfvrrkmbgs9b61ieuclre2qkp0c@4ax.com>, Kony wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> I's have said: NT 3.1, Win95, and XP64. All other changes have been
> evolutionary rather than revolutionary. I certainly don't see XP->Vista as
> a revolutionary change.
> There has also been a trend in that the more recent evolutionary upgrades
> have added less and less that is new and good, and more and more that is
> pointless (eye-candy) or unwanted (activation, DRM).
I agree. And I frankly doubt that MS is currently capable of
any major innovation. Not that there seems to be much room for
innovation.
Arno
|