| Peter Hucker 2004-07-09, 5:45 pm |
| On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:53:40 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> "Peter Hucker" <hucker@clara.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Idiot. I would not have even responded to your huge ugly posts, if it
> had not been to berate you for you laziness. It wouldn't do much good
> for me to trim a post that I don't intend to send, now does it?
> You've done the damage, posted the garbage, wasted the bandwidth, and
> there's nothing I can do about it.
Bandwidth? What are you on a 1200 baud?
>
> My wondering about your erroneous word usage does not make me "slow",
> idiot. Rather ironic, from the fool who can't even figure out why
> it's not good to send unreadable garbage all over usenet.
>
> Don't you know you're stupid?
I have no idea what you are referring to, as you have stupidly snipped the required context.
>
> Yet, in this case, neither one of you stupid top posters snipped, as
> is normal for top posters. Your hypothetic "if" is meaningless.
I am not a top poster. Get that through your thick head.
And if two people are the only ones conversing at that moment, and neither cares about long unsnipped messages, then where lies the problem?
>
> Idiot. Are you implying that the fact that someone complained somehow
> makes your garbage-posting less stupid?
You said unreadable. But you read it. Clever that eh?
>
> Idiot!
>
> "Ray's brother" indeed. Whoever "Ray" is... I guess it's common for
> top posters to expect others to work at understanding what the hell
> they are talking about.
Someone with several socks, who can write nothing useful to anyone, but just writes IDIOT everywhere.
--
13 parrots and rising http://www.petersparrots.com
93 silly video clips http://www.insanevideoclips.com
1259 digital photos http://www.petersphotos.com
Served from a pentawatercooled dual 2.8GHz silent Athlon with half TB RAID.
Does the Little Mermaid wear an algebra?
|