| Curious George 2006-03-07, 7:46 am |
| On 6 Mar 2006 22:01:42 -0800, "w_tom" <w_tom1@usa.net> wrote:
>Howard Kaikow wrote:
>
> How does a UPS that does not even claim to address such problems
>become best protection?
Because they do make such claims
> Posted previously are numerous technical
>reasons why that plug-in UPS provides no effective solution. Why claim
You only think your pontification is technical because you are a
blowhard.
>this UPS will reduce problems it does not even claim to solve?
Still can't fathom where you got that from.
> Effective hardware protection was provided. Another essential part
>of data protection is using NTFS files system on that disk - not use a
>repeatedly obsoleted FATxx file system.
Utterly clueless.
> Plug-in UPS provides protection to unsaved data. A plug-in UPS does
>nothing effective for hardware and backup system protection. Why
Wrong. Think "Line Conditioning"
>claim a UPS does things even its manufacturer does not claim?
They certainly do make these claims. Even if it is false or
misleading advertising you're still left out in the cold.
|