Data Storage - Re: High Level vs Low Level Formatting (was Format Iomega Rev as

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Data Storage > November 2004 > Re: High Level vs Low Level Formatting (was Format Iomega Rev as





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: High Level vs Low Level Formatting (was Format Iomega Rev as
Jon Forrest

2004-11-08, 5:45 pm

Robert Wessel wrote:
> Jon Forrest <forrest@ce.berkeley.edu> wrote in message news:<418A685D.3020907@ce.berkeley.edu>...
>
>
>
>
> Not exactly true. All current IDE hard drives have all the hardware
> and firmware on board to do the low level format. The manufacturer
> just doesn't tell people how to get at it.


I'm surprised word hasn't gotten out on how to do it.
Not even SpinRite tries to do it (see below).

> As a practical matter you
> cannot do a low level format of a modern hard drive with anything
> other than the exact set of heads that it will live its life with.


Sure, but since heads are never changed I don't see this being
a major obstacle. Also, why can SCSI controllers do it?

The real question is why somebody would want to do a low level format
in the first place. The only reason I can think of would be if the
disk has developed a bunch of bad blocks, but chances are that's a sign
of future failure, and low level formatting would only postpone the
inevitable. A low level format doesn't erase all the data on the disk,
but it makes the data very hard to find. However, people with big
security problems would not accept a low level format as a way
to erase a disk.

In any case, I stand corrected. It was just a guess.

Jon
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com