Data Storage - Direct Attached Storage - Dell vs HP?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Data Storage > November 2004 > Direct Attached Storage - Dell vs HP?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Direct Attached Storage - Dell vs HP?
Paul Hutchings

2004-11-14, 7:45 am

I'm struggling to find any web forums that cover servers and storage and
that sort of thing.

Long story short we have to change a bunch of kit at work including our
main filserver.

Ideally we'd like a SAN solution but they cost a small fortune.

Assuming a SAN is out of the question, we're looking at direct-attached,
and Dell (who we usually buy servers from) don't appear to offer much
beyond external SCSI enclosures which offer about 2TB per cabinet, which I
think we'll exceed.

This got me looking and I've seen HP do several SCSI attached, SATA disk
storage arrays, e.g MSA20

I've not used HP kit before, wondered if any IT types here have any
thoughts on the general HP vs Dell issue?

Also, and I know this is difficult to answer, but how does the performance
compare between SCSI and SATA direct attached arrays in a RAID5 file
serving environment - I'm thinking even on a switched network network speed
is an issue before hardware throughput comes into play?

cheers,
Paul
--
paul <at> spamcop.net
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com