|
Home > Archive > Data Storage > February 2005 > 8 Drive Raid 10 vs 3 separate Raid Arrays
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
8 Drive Raid 10 vs 3 separate Raid Arrays
|
|
| cintreon@universaltelecom.com 2005-02-28, 5:46 pm |
| I am going to put together a dedicated SQL Server and was wondering if
I would be better of with having one 8 drive raid 10 array which would
include the os, database, and transaction logs or the following
configuration:
OS: Raid 1
Database: Raid 10
Transaction Logs: Raid 1
The controller will be an Adaptec 39320A-R
and the drives will all be Maxtor 18GB 10K U320.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
| |
| themeanies 2005-02-28, 8:45 pm |
| You most definitely do not want the data and logs on the same drives.
tM
cintreon@universaltelecom.com wrote:
> I am going to put together a dedicated SQL Server and was wondering if
> I would be better of with having one 8 drive raid 10 array which would
> include the os, database, and transaction logs or the following
> configuration:
>
> OS: Raid 1
> Database: Raid 10
> Transaction Logs: Raid 1
>
> The controller will be an Adaptec 39320A-R
> and the drives will all be Maxtor 18GB 10K U320.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
----== Posted via webservertalk.com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.webservertalk.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
|
|
|
|