Data Storage - Re: failover cluster using 64 bit windows 2k3 on single HBAs and DS400 with dual contr

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Data Storage > April 2006 > Re: failover cluster using 64 bit windows 2k3 on single HBAs and DS400 with dual contr





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: failover cluster using 64 bit windows 2k3 on single HBAs and DS400 with dual contr
uspensky@gmail.com

2006-04-18, 12:13 am

logically that would make sense that MSCS would be responsible for
everything.
however.... both nodes are able to see the storage but can only read
the drives when the respective controller is the active one.

both initiators have access to all the LUNs on the storage. both HBAs
have access to all LUNs

>
> It sounds like you're trying to persuade the DS400 to control your failover
> action. You're making a LUN available to one node, and when a failure occurs
> you're expecting the DS400 to switch ownership of that LUN to the other node
> so it can proceed. That's not what you want. You want both nodes to see and
> share the LUN(s) on the DS400 at all times. Mscs will then figure out
> between the two nodes which one will access the LUN.
>
> Rob


Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com