Data Storage - Re: Homebuilt server (NAS/SAN) vs the prefab ones? Peformance differences? SAN vs NAS

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Data Storage > January 2007 > Re: Homebuilt server (NAS/SAN) vs the prefab ones? Peformance differences? SAN vs NAS





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Homebuilt server (NAS/SAN) vs the prefab ones? Peformance differences? SAN vs NAS
markm75

2007-01-25, 1:14 pm



On Jan 25, 7:18 am, "Maxim S. Shatskih" <m...@storagecraft.com> wrote:
> Device Manager/Properties in Windows though. By default, it is off.
>
> --
> Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
> StorageCraft Corporation
> m...@storagecraft.comhttp://www.storagecraft.com



Would I want to set jumbo frames on all of my servers sending data, or
just the receiving, backup server? Are there any drawbacks to using
this setting, as I'm not sure what it provides for exactly? I only
noticed the jumbo frames option on one of my various NICs, even a built
in Intel Pro/1000 PM didnt seem to have the setting, for the one that
did it had several "size" options, I'm assuming I'd set that to the
max?

Same question on dual NICs.. I'm wondering if this will make the
backups and general access that much better (I'm assuming I would have
to use trunking via the switch?).. Would I want dual nics on each
server or only the backup server?

Cheers

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com