Data Storage - M`I'5.Pe rsecution ` Comp aring the MI5 Persecuti on wi th Germa n Fin al Solut ion

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Data Storage > December 2007 > M`I'5.Pe rsecution ` Comp aring the MI5 Persecuti on wi th Germa n Fin al Solut ion





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author M`I'5.Pe rsecution ` Comp aring the MI5 Persecuti on wi th Germa n Fin al Solut ion
fimemvmf@hotmail.com

2007-12-26, 7:15 am


MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 16 April,. 1999

If You Intend. To Reply, Please Read This
Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page. or two will
be. deleted without being read.

BBC. newscaster Nicholas Witchell cant stop himself laughing

During 1990-91 there were very many instances. of "interactive
television" where. newscasters and other TV presenters saw on a screen
before them what was. happening in my home, and reacted, frequently by
laughing at me. During this period. I unfortunately did not record these
programmes. For the last year or two,. I have been recording everything I
watch, and there has been a drastic decrease in such. incidents.

However,. on occasion, television presenters do still engage in
"interactive watching" and react to what they see. This. has been evident
with Jon. Snow of Channel Four News recently - a particularly interesting
case, since it has been established that he. cannot be corrupted by money
(it is well-documented that MI5 offered him a tax-free. salary and he
turned them down). I wonder what. device MI5 are using to encourage him to
do the. "interactive watching"?

On Saturday 10 April. 1999 at 7pm, Nicholas Witchell on BBC2 News reacted
when he saw. that I was watching the programme, and I have his reactions
stored safely on videotape. I have. watched this tape several times and I
am entirely confident that my evaluation of his reactions. is correct. For
several minutes his upper lip quivered in mirth. as he attempted to keep a
straight face. Then finally. his self-control evaporated through the excuse
of a weak joke. and his face collapsed into a grin.

The strange thing is that I dont. know why he was laughing at me, what I
had done recently to "deserve" to be laughed at. The. MI5 persecutors
usually manage to invent some justification as to why people. should laugh
at and/or abuse me. ("hes an X", "it was so funny" etc), so Mr Witchell
could have been. laughing for any number of reasons. Perhaps he found the
views I have been. expressing in these articles amusing? I suppose if youre
paid enough money and ordered. to laugh then even the most innocuous thing
becomes. funny.

Jon Snow of Channel Four News cant stop himself. smirking, either.

On 12 February 1999 I was watching Channel Four News presented by. Jon
Snow. As usual,. I was recording the programme, so that if anything out of
the ordinary happened, Id be able to go back and. watch it again.

Now, Jon Snow, by his own claim,. is uncorruptible. He says he turned down
an offer of a substantial tax-free salary from MI5 - they wanted to. make
him their mouthpiece, and he told them where to. get off.

So. you will be most surprised to learn that Jon Snow "interactively
watched" me that evening,. and on many other evenings. Approximately
fifteen minutes into the programme, he. announced that the US President
would be making a live. appearance at about 7.30pm; I looked at the clock
on the. mantelpiece; and Snow saw me looking at the clock, and visibly
tried to suppress. a smirk.

Uncorruptible, are you, Mister Snow? If not money, then why. are you
watching me, Mister. Snow? Are they forcing you to watch me? Cant you turn
the monitor. off, Mister Snow?

Keith. Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever
refuses to. help.

Comparing the MI5 Persecution. with German "Final Solution"

It might seem. offensive to compare the mass murder of millions of
civilians in wartime. with the peacetime persecution of merely one
person. Yet the comparison has. been coursing through my mind for several
years. now, because the brutality of German intent to "sub-humans" is very
much comparable to the brutality of British intent to someone. they
vituperate and term. "not up to British standards". The methods may differ,
but the persecutors mindset is the. same.

The Germans first targeted. the mentally disabled, too

During WW2 millions of. ethnic Russians, Poles, Jews, mentally ill, gypsies
and other minorities were rounded. up and murdered in purpose-built camps
by the German regime, in the name of "racial superiority". Fifty years. on,
the British Secret Police, MI5, instituted a. campaign of mass
hysteria; but. in their cowardice, limited their activities to one single
victim.

It is instructive to note that the early German "cleansing". effort was
directed primarily not at Jews, but at the mentally. ill. The Nazis set up
the T4 project in the thirties to. "cleanse" away 70,000 mentally disabled
people, including schizophrenics and epileptics. After. WW2 the Jews with
their media influence. used the reaction from the holocaust to roll back
anti-semitism. in the Western countries; however, the mentally ill are
today. still a persecuted group in the modern Western world as they were
under the Nazis (the current Jewish. home secretary in the UK intends to
bring. in laws for incarceration without any criminal charge for some
mentally ill people - he protects his own minority, but does nothing. for
the other minorities in todays society), and this. continuing bias forms a
central cause for the current acts of persecution in the. UK.

Widespread knowledge of what. is happening to the "un-British" minority

In both the German. persecution of the thirties and early forties, and the
current British persecution,. many, many people are well aware of whats
happening. There is widespread complicity through. inaction of
populace; and. in a substantial proportion of the mainstread population,
the. persecution had/has widespread enthusiastic support; yet in both the
German case in the 1940s and the British. today, the existence of
persecution is a mass. secret which must be never admitted out loud. In the
recent Lawrence case this "secret bigotry" has. been termed
"institutionalised. racism", and that is a very good word for what the
British are doing today The persecutory attitudes and. omerta regarding
them are. so deeply ingrained in the national psyche that they define the
national. mood

During WW2 many Germans. knew minorities were disappearing, and through
inaction quietly condoned. their government's mass murder of
"un-German" minorities. and inferior "foreigners"; and in the 1990s,
similarly, many English. people know what the MI5 British Secret Police
have been doing, and. not only condone it, but actively take part, because
of xenophobia. against the "un-British" unit minority that is the target of
"British" actions. This attitude by the British persecutors has been. made
explicit through the words "he's not up to. British standards"; the British
seem to have found their very own "untermenschen" to. victimise.

Why. these obsessive "holy wars" happen

This type. of aggression occurs when the majority is threatened or
humiliated in some way, economically, militarily or. culturally. In pre-WW2
Germany the threat was primarily economic and military,. following
Germany's humiliating defeat in the first world. war and the reparations it
was forced to pay. In modern. Britain, one might guess that the majority
English who are behind the. persecution feel pressured by the swiftly
diminishing status of Britain in the. world, and the rapidly increasing
coloured colonisation of their country, which in. time will see the ethnic
English a minority in their own land, and their more antisocial. elements,
unable to reply to the. obvious threat, instead project their aggression
onto another, weaker, unit. minority

In both cases there is a whiff of "holy war" or. irrational obsession with
the persecution. Certainly. the German behaviour fifty years ago bordered
on the. not-quite-sane, and the current British behaviour towards their
chosen victim is strongly tinged with a leave-taking of reason.. And the
choices open to the victims are the same, since MI5 will. never allow me to
escape them, "if he tries to run. away we'll find him", just like the
commandant of Auschwitz telling the new arrivals,. "the only escape is
through the. chimney".

The Victim Will Destroy Us if We. Dont Destroy Him First

The persecutors propaganda is the same.. Fifty years ago the Germans said,
"if we don't do it to the Jews then. the Jews will do it to us"; and MI5's
propaganda in the early nineties concentrated on their. victim as a
"monster" aesome. "untermenschen" minority.

"We are. decent fellows" say the Brutal Persecutors

During the course of researching this article I read part of. the very
interesting book, "Hitler - A. Study in Tyranny", by Alan Bullock. This
volume contains a quote from Himmler on the "Final. Solution";

"Most of you know. what it means when a hundred corpses are lying side by
side, or five hundred or. one thousand. To have stuck it out, and at the
same time .... to have. remained decent fellows, that is what has made us
hard. This is a page of glory in our history which has never. been written
and is never to be. written."

In the MI5. persecution, too, there is a thread of deliberate brutality to
the sick and vulnerable, while the persecutors maintain that "we. are
decent fellows". There is almost a conscious schizophrenia in. the
self-attitudes of the Security Service operatives. and those in the public
who. they employ against me, which reflects the contradiction evident in
the German attitude above. On. the one hand, they stoop to the lowest and
most base behaviour; yet at the same time, the. MI5 operatives tell
themselves that since they are civilised. British people, then surely they
must by definition be "decent fellows". Any. indecency is made the fault of
the victim; "hes making us persecute him, so. we need feel no guilt".

Yet. the conduct is atypical of the way these peoples see their normal
modes. of behaviour. Befslaughter was not typical of normal German
behaviour up to that point. Similarly, the. current MI5 abuse goes against
the grain. of British self-image as being "reserved" and "decent", since
they are using terms of abuse which are common. among blacks and other
supposedly. less-developed races, but not among the English.

Conclusion

The ultimate aim. of both persecutions is the humiliation and physical
extinction of the persecuted group. The Germans did this in a very. direct
way; the British Secret Police MI5 are acting indirectly. and relying on
self-extinction of. their target, because in peacetime and in the current
somewhat false climate of "political correctness" more direct. methods are
impossible.. If MI5 undertook more direct action the mass "omerta" would be
broken.

I have written. this article with sincerity to show how a historically
recent. persecution in another country parallels what is being done in this
country today. In both cases, the evil-doers are of. their countries
establishments, and rely on widespread. tacit support to maintain the
persecution and omerta around it.. While the holocaust was undoubtedly the
greater evil, it is. important to be aware of the fact that had the Germans
not been defeated fifty years ago, their plans would have gone. through to
total completion. In. Britain today no force threatens the "permanent
government". of which the Security Service forms a part; and it looks very
unlikely that. the wrongs perpetrated by the MI5 secret police will ever be
revealed to public. view, and the British secret state brought to justice
for its evil. actions.

445

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com