| Arno Wagner 2007-04-05, 1:15 pm |
| In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage markm75 <markm75c@msn.com> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 5:23 am, Arno Wagner <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Results are in.. Used shadow protect.. set to 50GB files at a time on
> the backup file side.. average throughput 23 MB/s.. finished in 4hr 25
> minutes, the same time as a local backup took (this was across
> gigabit).
Interesting.
> So I guess its true.. there is something to the polution of the cache/
> registry issue? Anyone have a KB article where I could find the tweak
> and try this again without splitting the backup files? (Not sure what
> I'm searching for exactly).
Why not just split the backup? This seems to work, after all.
If you want this a bit better sorted, put each backup set
into one subdirectory.
Arno
|