Data Storage - Re: Raid0 or Raid5 for network to disk backup (Gigabit)?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Data Storage > April 2007 > Re: Raid0 or Raid5 for network to disk backup (Gigabit)?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Raid0 or Raid5 for network to disk backup (Gigabit)?
Arno Wagner

2007-04-06, 7:13 am

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Maxim S. Shatskih <maxim@storagecraft.com> wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> So, >4GB files for ext2 is one of these additional features? OK, thanks, will
> know this.


[vbcol=seagreen]
> NTFS is more like ReiserFS. From what I've read on ReiserFS design - it is just
> plain remake based on the same ideas as NTFS - attribute streams, B-tree
> directories, MFT etc.


> NTFS just predates ReiserFS by around 10 years, which is a clear sign of
> "substandard technologies used by MS" :-) The only competitors to NTFS that
> time of 1993 were VMS's filesystem and Veritas's product for Solaris.


[vbcol=seagreen]
> So, I'm not this wrong. 2TB limit was there very small time ago.


Well, the 2.6.0 was published in december 2003. I would not call 4 years
''very small time'', considering disk sizes in 2003.

There are, BTW, some more filesystems available under Linux and
they are basically all pretty compatible. For really large
filesystems you would probably not use ext2 anyways, but perhaps
XFS (which also has been available on Linux since around 2001).
XFS has a file size limit and filesystem limit of 8 exabytes.

Arno
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com