|
Home > Archive > Linux Debian support > May 2007 > Re: Etch really "stable"? Yes, it is. If not, report bug to package maintai
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: Etch really "stable"? Yes, it is. If not, report bug to package maintai
|
|
| AJackson 2007-05-10, 1:15 pm |
| On May 10, 4:00 pm, Sabine Engelhardt <fro...@bilkinfo.de> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> The bug seems to be in the new file selection box of icedove. It reads
> the complete directory index each time it loads and saves (!) files. If
> there are a lot of files in the index, it needs a lot of time and memory
> -- the more often I exported mails or attachments, the more memory
> icedove-bin needed, according to top.
>
> It seems that the memory icedove takes for this operations is not given
> back to the system after the operation. I have already reported the
> problem to the package maintainer and will update this today.
Good to know, thanks for the info (though I dont use Icedove myself)
> Iceweasel doesn't seem to be slowlier here (PIII/500, 256 MB, etch).
> Quite the converse: The cache seems to be organised in a better way, and
> to go back one page with the back button is much faster.
> But this is etch; the OP asked for iceweasel (and evolution) on sarge.
Which there is non. Iceweasel was introduced in Debian/Etch.
So jamiil, how do your /etc/apt/sources.list looks like?
Good Luck
|
|
|
|
|