|
Home > Archive > Linux Debian support > September 2007 > Gnomebaker error
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Edmund 2007-08-21, 7:14 pm |
| Debian Etch
Hi I tried Gnomebaker to burn a re-writable CD.
It is a brand new DVD writer (LG) which I didn't
test on any other OS.
Here is what I read in the message window in
Gomebaker:
--------------------
CDB: 2A 00 FF FF FF 6A 00 00 1F 00
status: 0x4 (CONDITION MET/GOOD)
resid: 63488
cmd finished after 205.462s timeout 200s
wodim: faio_wait_on_buffer for writer timed out.
Errno: 0 (Success), write_g1 scsi sendcmd: no error
CDB: 2A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1F 00
status: 0x4 (CONDITION MET/GOOD)
resid: 63488
cmd finished after 205.464s timeout 200s
wodim: A write error occured.
wodim: Please properly read the error message above
----------------------------
Anyone know what is going wrong and what can I
do about it?
Edmund
| |
| sk8r-365 2007-08-21, 7:14 pm |
| Government satellites recorded Edmund saying:
> Debian Etch
>
> Hi I tried Gnomebaker to burn a re-writable CD.
> It is a brand new DVD writer (LG) which I didn't
> test on any other OS.
We're not standing behind your shoulder watching your every move; unlike Mr.
Gates. So, ... DVD burner and CD disc? OK, what disc is it - brand name,
capacity? How much data were you trying to burn to it? Which LG? LG model
number, connection type, etc. You're on which Linux distro - Debian, Ubuntu,
Mandriva or about 200 others to choose from, and version (release)?
<snio>
> wodim: faio_wait_on_buffer for writer timed out.
> Errno: 0 (Success), write_g1 scsi sendcmd: no error
<snip>
Focus on that message. Show us the set up from the application -
especially any "tweaks" you may have made.
--
sk8r-365
http://goodbye-microsoft.com/
| |
| sk8r-365 2007-08-21, 7:14 pm |
| Government satellites recorded sk8r-365 saying:
> Government satellites recorded Edmund saying:
>
> You're on which Linux distro - Debian, Ubuntu,
> Mandriva or about 200 others to choose from, and version (release)?
My bad, you have a line at the top - Debian Etch. Sorry.
> <snio>
> <snip>
>
> Focus on that message. Show us the set up from the application -
> especially any "tweaks" you may have made.
>
See if this info helps:
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-.../msg264234.html
--
sk8r-365
http://goodbye-microsoft.com/
| |
|
| try k3b and see what happens is another burner i like it.
sk8r-365 wrote:
> Government satellites recorded Edmund saying:
>
> We're not standing behind your shoulder watching your every move; unlike Mr.
> Gates. So, ... DVD burner and CD disc? OK, what disc is it - brand name,
> capacity? How much data were you trying to burn to it? Which LG? LG model
> number, connection type, etc. You're on which Linux distro - Debian, Ubuntu,
> Mandriva or about 200 others to choose from, and version (release)?
>
> <snio>
> <snip>
>
> Focus on that message. Show us the set up from the application -
> especially any "tweaks" you may have made.
>
| |
| Joerg Schilling 2007-08-22, 1:13 am |
| In article <46cb2f28$0$21174$bf4948fe@news.tele2.nl>,
Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Debian Etch
>
>Hi I tried Gnomebaker to burn a re-writable CD.
>It is a brand new DVD writer (LG) which I didn't
>test on any other OS.
>
>
>Here is what I read in the message window in
>Gomebaker:
>--------------------
>CDB: 2A 00 FF FF FF 6A 00 00 1F 00
>status: 0x4 (CONDITION MET/GOOD)
>resid: 63488
>cmd finished after 205.462s timeout 200s
>wodim: faio_wait_on_buffer for writer timed out.
>Errno: 0 (Success), write_g1 scsi sendcmd: no error
>CDB: 2A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1F 00
>status: 0x4 (CONDITION MET/GOOD)
>resid: 63488
>cmd finished after 205.464s timeout 200s
>wodim: A write error occured.
>wodim: Please properly read the error message above
>----------------------------
>
>Anyone know what is going wrong and what can I
>do about it?
Are you sure that you use a recent cdrecord version?
If not (or if you use one of the bastardized versions), upgrade
to a recent one:
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/
This is a contition that cannot happen with ATAPI drives.
There is a well known miss-concept in the Linux kernel that causes
Linux to return impossible SCSI status codes for every odd Linux
release. This is because some places in the Linux kernel use
shifted SCSI status code values and nobody from the hackers seem to know when
there is a need to convert between these universes.
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
| |
| Joerg Schilling 2007-08-22, 1:13 am |
| In article <8frrp4-i0d.ln1@sk8r.hosts.bc1.bresnan.net>,
sk8r-365 <sk8r-365@sk8r.debian.etch.invalid.org> wrote:
>Government satellites recorded Edmund saying:
>
>We're not standing behind your shoulder watching your every move; unlike Mr.
>Gates. So, ... DVD burner and CD disc? OK, what disc is it - brand name,
>capacity? How much data were you trying to burn to it? Which LG? LG model
>number, connection type, etc. You're on which Linux distro - Debian, Ubuntu,
>Mandriva or about 200 others to choose from, and version (release)?
>
><snio>
><snip>
If you use wodim, you lost already......... you should better upgrade to a
recent original from:
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
| |
|
|
|
|
| Edmund 2007-08-22, 7:14 am |
| Joerg Schilling wrote:
> In article <8frrp4-i0d.ln1@sk8r.hosts.bc1.bresnan.net>,
> sk8r-365 <sk8r-365@sk8r.debian.etch.invalid.org> wrote:
>
> If you use wodim, you lost already......... you should better upgrade to a
> recent original from:
>
> http://cdrecord.berlios.de/
Hi Joerg.
Good to see you here, I've seen your name
before on a BeOS site.
I upgraded to a lower version of your site
and quess what?
First CD I burned after that came out fine :-)
Thanks a lot
Edmund
| |
| Edmund 2007-08-22, 7:14 am |
| josh wrote:
> try k3b and see what happens is another burner i like it.
K3b had the same problem, ( or worse ) after installing
another cdrecord version as Joerg Shilling told,
the first test went OK now :-)
Edmund
| |
| AJackson 2007-09-05, 7:14 pm |
| On Aug 22, 12:03 pm, Edmund <nom...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> josh wrote:
>
> K3b had the same problem, ( or worse ) after installing
> another cdrecord version as Joerg Shilling told,
> the first test went OK now :-)
>
> Edmund
Please send in a bug report on the debian package you used. If you
don't, it's a risk that it won't be fixed.
Good luck.
| |
| Joerg Schilling 2007-09-06, 7:16 am |
| In article <1189036627.214779.276490@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
AJackson <anders.jackson@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 22, 12:03 pm, Edmund <nom...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Please send in a bug report on the debian package you used. If you
>don't, it's a risk that it won't be fixed.
Debian has no cdrtools package and the "cdrkit" package is dead since 4 months.
It is unlikely that a bug report will change things on Debian unless you ask
Debian to go back again to the original software.
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
| |
| AJackson 2007-09-06, 1:14 pm |
| On Sep 6, 1:04 pm, j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> In article <1189036627.214779.276...@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
>
> AJackson <anders.jack...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Debian has no cdrtools package and the "cdrkit" package is dead since 4 months.
Yes, I know that Debian doesn't have cdrtools, but have a link for
"back compatibility" to wodim.
It doesn't look dead since 4 month when I looked[1][2].
> It is unlikely that a bug report will change things on Debian unless you ask
> Debian to go back again to the original software.
As you are part in a long going "issue" with Debian about, qhat I
understand, patches to your cdrtools that
you guard so well, I won't go into this any further with you (as I am
but an observer and don't know every
part of the problem that lead to a fork of cdrecord).
Yours
A Jackson
[1] http://www.cdrkit.org/
[2] http://alioth.debian.org/projects/debburn
| |
| Joerg Schilling 2007-09-06, 7:15 pm |
| In article <1189086392.929612.75520@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>,
AJackson <anders.jackson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Yes, I know that Debian doesn't have cdrtools, but have a link for
>"back compatibility" to wodim.
It isn't compatible as it e.g. does not autoformat maiden DVD+RW
It does not properly DVD, it does not support BluRay and it does
not support as much CDRWIN cue sheet features. There are a lot of other
missing features, e.g. no find(1) built into mkisofs, no extended UDF support,
no RockRidge V-1.12 support, no support for files > 4 GB.......
see http://cdrecord.berlios.de/new/private/linux-dist.html
>It doesn't look dead since 4 month when I looked[1][2].
If you did really look at these URLs, you would of course know that
it is dead since 4 months.
>
>As you are part in a long going "issue" with Debian about, qhat I
>understand, patches to your cdrtools that
>you guard so well, I won't go into this any further with you (as I am
>but an observer and don't know every
>part of the problem that lead to a fork of cdrecord).
These people have problems with minimal quality standards. I cannot accept
patches that would obviously introduce bugs into my software.
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
| |
| AJackson 2007-09-22, 1:17 am |
| On Sep 7, 12:38 am, j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> In article <1189086392.929612.75...@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>,
>
> AJackson <anders.jack...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> It isn't compatible as it e.g. does not autoformat maiden DVD+RW
> It does not properly DVD, it does not support BluRay and it does
> not support as much CDRWIN cue sheet features. There are a lot of other
> missing features, e.g. no find(1) built into mkisofs, no extended UDF support,
> no RockRidge V-1.12 support, no support for files > 4 GB.......
>
> seehttp://cdrecord.berlios.de/new/private/linux-dist.html
>
>
> If you did really look at these URLs, you would of course know that
> it is dead since 4 months.
>
>
>
> These people have problems with minimal quality standards. I cannot accept
> patches that would obviously introduce bugs into my software.
Those issues was about licences, if I remember right.
You might have fixed those bugs now. But that was an issue for Debian
and free software.
Yours, A Jackson
| |
| Joerg Schilling 2007-09-22, 7:12 pm |
| In article <1190425299.381079.12080@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
AJackson <anders.jackson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Those issues was about licences, if I remember right.
>You might have fixed those bugs now. But that was an issue for Debian
>and free software.
An interesting view but it is nonsense:
Cdrtools is of course free software.
Distributions that asked a lawyer _do_ redistribute the original cdrtools
because they know that there is neither an issue with "free" nor with the
license.
Debian makes a decision on hate based claims from laymen....
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
| |
|
| On 09/22/2007 03:17 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> In article <1190425299.381079.12080@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> AJackson <anders.jackson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> An interesting view but it is nonsense:
>
> Cdrtools is of course free software.
>
Irrelevant and untrue.
That's irrelevant because the issue is not whether cdrtools is free or
not; the issue is whether the license governing most of its code (CDDL)
is compatible with a license governing parts of its code (GPL).
Your statement is untrue because the incompatibility arising from your
decision to mingle CDDL and GPL'd code has made your software legally
non-distributable; it's not free if it's illegal to distribute the software.
>
> Distributions that asked a lawyer _do_ redistribute the original cdrtools
> because they know that there is neither an issue with "free" nor with the
> license.
What distributions are you talking about, and how do you know they
talked to lawyers?
>
> Debian makes a decision on hate based claims from laymen....
>
Your claim that Debian made the decision to fork cdrtools based on
animosity and ignorance is ludicrous. The FSF (creator of the GPL) says
that the CDDL is incompatible with the GPL¹. Management figures at Sun
Microsystems (creators of the CDDL) say that the CDDL is incompatible
with the GPL².
For virtually everyone but you, the argument over the compatibility
between the two licenses is over. Debian had no choice but to fork.
Cdrtools, under its current licensing scheme, cannot be legally
distributed; Debian can't even include cdrtools in its non-free section,
and Debian users do need a CD-burning application.
Please stop using red herrings such as "CDDL is opensource" or "CDDL is
accepted by Debian." The issue is that a program cannot contain both GPL
and CDDL codes that link with one another, and that's what the current
cdrtools is.
By distributing cdrtools (in its current form), you are violating the
GPL; if Debian were to do so, they'd also be in violation.
I suspect you enjoy the drama, so I don't expect things to change much.
But you could end the drama over your program by placing it under the
GPL. Or you could rewrite the GPL'd parts yourself, remove all GPL'd
code and place the entire cdrtools under the CDDL.
Of course, I know that there's no chance you'll do anything reasonable
to stop this controversy.
--------
¹ http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html
² http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDDL
| |
| Joerg Schilling 2007-09-23, 7:14 am |
| In article <13fbmi1d9na493c@corp.supernews.com>,
Tofus <tofus-88652+usenet@mypacks.net> wrote:
>
>Irrelevant and untrue.
You are spreading FUD!
>That's irrelevant because the issue is not whether cdrtools is free or
>not; the issue is whether the license governing most of its code (CDDL)
>is compatible with a license governing parts of its code (GPL).
This is FUD!
Let me remove the rest of your lies you just wrote to harm free software like
cdrtools and explain things in a single block.
The GPL is an _asymmectric_ license that forbids to use GPLd code from within
_other_ code.
The GPL does _not_ forbid to use non-GPLd code from within GPLd code.
In cdrtools, no GPL code is used from non-GPLd code.
In cdrtools no non-GPL source is based on or derived from GPL code.
A asume that you did never read the GPL text but instead read incorrect
FAQs on the GPL that try to explain the GPL using the inapropriate term
"linking". The GPL text does not contain the term "linking", as it is entirely
based on the copyright term "derived work".
The GPL allows _any_ type of linking as long as no new derived work based
on GPL code is created.
Cdrtools are of course redistributable and the distributions that redistibute
cdrtools did ask lawyers that confirmed there is no problem!
Debian based it's decision on the "legal opinion" from laymen like Armstrong and
Bloch. No Lawyer did ever claim there is a problem....
The law professor Eben Moglen explained why this kind of using GPLd code is no
problem in general in his talk at the first GPLv3 press conference. Do you
believe that laymen know more than law professors?
Well, Bloch in his arrogance did also claim he knows better than me (the Author)
how cdrecord works...
Are you just a victim of these people or are you interested in actively harming
free software like cdrtools?
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
|
|
|
|
|