| Jesse Benton 2005-01-05, 2:45 am |
| Terry,
I need some help crafting you a case. I have done small facilities with
just one custodian and at least gotten this to stop. You were able to
get Mebane settled.
I have a single facility custodian now out on disability. We have
already grieved that this should be a 2.7 custodian positions. To fill
in for him, they are using RCA's TRC's, casuals. I have documents to
back this up, form 50's and time cards, showing when these people worked
as a custodian.
None of these employees are dual appointments. We have won these. Or at
least a cease and desist. This is the only real violation I can find.
This is were we need to be creative and I need your help.
This facility has only one PTF, she is a 204b working 40 hours a week.
This was do to a function 4 that excessed 4 people out of the facility
if I remember the number right. I have used MMO-028-97 section 5 as you
suggested to show the replacement should be a career person. Labor is
telling the PM we are wrong ( of course).
The PM wants a custodian, this is a 14,500 sq ft building and is
planned to be contracted out. I will suggest a BMC position, but would
like something more concrete if you can come up with it. The idea of
this make most PM's drool that are about to lose their custodians to
subcontractor. But it has no contractually mandate that I aware of.
Thanks in advance for your help
Jesse Benton
828-428-4115 H
828-431-4141 W 3 pm -11:30 pm
|