|
Home > Archive > Red Hat Topics > December 2005 > Fising Missing Dependencies
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Fising Missing Dependencies
|
|
| Whitewater 2005-12-12, 5:48 pm |
| I am trying to update Gnome from 2.1.0 to 2.1.12 using the nr-*
repositories but keep getting the error message:
--> Processing Dependency: libgsf-1.so.1 for package: wv2
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libgsf-1.so.1 is needed by package wv2
I tried to install libgsf-1.so.1 by enabling all repositories, but it
failed also.
It seems to be a problem with the repository itself. How do go about
getting this fixed?
Thanks
Whitewater
| |
|
| On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:54:05 +0000, Whitewater wrote this:
> I am trying to update Gnome from 2.1.0 to 2.1.12 using the nr-*
> repositories but keep getting the error message:
>
> --> Processing Dependency: libgsf-1.so.1 for package: wv2 --> Finished
> Dependency Resolution
> Error: Missing Dependency: libgsf-1.so.1 is needed by package wv2
>
> I tried to install libgsf-1.so.1 by enabling all repositories, but it
> failed also.
>
> It seems to be a problem with the repository itself. How do go about
> getting this fixed?
>
> Thanks
> Whitewater
Do a search (google) for libgsf-1.so which should id a repository and
containing package for that library. Either install it individually or
add the repository although you may need to carefully sequence the
repositories.
Before you try a version for a different OS look for the RH version.
http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/suse/9...1-115.i586.html
| |
| Whitewater 2005-12-13, 5:48 pm |
| On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:26:35 GMT, noi <noi@siam.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:54:05 +0000, Whitewater wrote this:
>
>
>Do a search (google) for libgsf-1.so which should id a repository and
>containing package for that library. Either install it individually or
>add the repository although you may need to carefully sequence the
>repositories.
>
>Before you try a version for a different OS look for the RH version.
>http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/suse/9...1-115.i586.html
I found the newest version of libgsf for fedora and downloaded it.
When I try to install it, there are quite a few dependencies needed by
it. I am unable to locate the repositories for the dependencies
though.
I downloaded the rpm for apt. I've never used it to update the system.
Would it be better to use apt than yum? What command would I use?
Thanks
Whitewater
| |
|
| On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:19:09 +0000, Whitewater wrote this:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:26:35 GMT, noi <noi@siam.com> wrote:
>
>
> I found the newest version of libgsf for fedora and downloaded it. When I
> try to install it, there are quite a few dependencies needed by it. I am
> unable to locate the repositories for the dependencies though.
>
> I downloaded the rpm for apt. I've never used it to update the system.
> Would it be better to use apt than yum? What command would I use?
>
Did you download the libgsf-devel and install that ? That's the problem
trying to install cutting edge versions, you may need to install different
versions of existing software that may or not be compatible.
Try the libgsf-devel version and see if that clears up some dependencies,
otherwise you'll have to "yum search" and google to fix the dependencies
or wait for FC5's implementation of Gnome 2.12.2.
I see Ubuntu has Gnome 2.12.2 and Gnome.org has a liveCD for Gnome 2.12.2.
Sorry don't know Apt.
| |
| Whitewater 2005-12-14, 5:48 pm |
| On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:34:04 GMT, noi <noi@siam.com> wrote:
CLIP
>
>Did you download the libgsf-devel and install that ? That's the problem
>trying to install cutting edge versions, you may need to install different
>versions of existing software that may or not be compatible.
>
>Try the libgsf-devel version and see if that clears up some dependencies,
>otherwise you'll have to "yum search" and google to fix the dependencies
>or wait for FC5's implementation of Gnome 2.12.2.
>
>I see Ubuntu has Gnome 2.12.2 and Gnome.org has a liveCD for Gnome 2.12.2.
>
>Sorry don't know Apt.
I downloaded Ubuntu and it's working perfectly now, after I figured
out the what root password was. I like the fact that it boots faster
than Fedora 4 did.. It's running on a pentium III 600 mhz w/256 mb
ram.
Thanks
Whitewater
| |
|
| On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:59:59 +0000, Whitewater wrote this:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:34:04 GMT, noi <noi@siam.com> wrote: CLIP
>
> I downloaded Ubuntu and it's working perfectly now, after I figured out
> the what root password was. I like the fact that it boots faster than
> Fedora 4 did.. It's running on a pentium III 600 mhz w/256 mb ram.
>
> Thanks
> Whitewater
Congrats, glad to help. Sorry you've left the RH/FC distros. I
found Ubuntu very easy to use as a desktop but harder to configure as a
server.
| |
| Whitewater 2005-12-14, 5:48 pm |
| On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:07:31 GMT, noi <noi@siam.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:59:59 +0000, Whitewater wrote this:
>
>
>Congrats, glad to help. Sorry you've left the RH/FC distros. I
>found Ubuntu very easy to use as a desktop but harder to configure as a
>server.
That's the one thing I use linux for.. a webserver, database server,
ftp & email, for developement purposes. I can install XAMPP to take
care of most of it. It's easy because it's configured to work together
'out of box.' All I have to do is get dovecot installed and working
and I'm good to go.
I also notices that there are no newsgroups on my news server for
ubunto/kubunto.
Thanks again
Whitewater
| |
| Whitewater 2005-12-18, 7:46 am |
| On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:07:31 GMT, noi <noi@siam.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:59:59 +0000, Whitewater wrote this:
>
>
>Congrats, glad to help. Sorry you've left the RH/FC distros. I
>found Ubuntu very easy to use as a desktop but harder to configure as a
>server.
After playing around with Ubuntu, as well as a couple of other
distributions, I have decided that Fedora is the best distribution
available. It installs perfectly, and is easy to configure.
Whitewater
| |
|
| On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:59:43 +0000, Whitewater wrote this:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:07:31 GMT, noi <noi@siam.com> wrote:
>
>
> After playing around with Ubuntu, as well as a couple of other
> distributions, I have decided that Fedora is the best distribution
> available. It installs perfectly, and is easy to configure.
>
> Whitewater
I tried FC4 on my PIII 933 256ram and I didn't like it. Numerous caveats,
compiling source code and bottom line Nautilus issues. I went to SUSE9.3
after fighting through the install disks, I find it easy to use and
configure. I have issues with S9.3 nfs server but otherwise it's rock
solid and easy to use.
Still running a FC3 system but I'll move it to FC5 x86-64 final when
available.
|
|
|
|
|