Anonymous Servers - Opinion: BigApple is the best remailer overall

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > October 2004 > Opinion: BigApple is the best remailer overall





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Opinion: BigApple is the best remailer overall
Nomen Nescio

2004-10-23, 7:45 am

maybe you disagree. Your favorite?
Copelandia Cyanescens

2004-10-24, 7:45 am

Nomen Nescio wrote...

> maybe you disagree. Your favorite?


How can there be a "best remailer" when no single remailer is worth much
of anything alone? Even two used together are technically worthless.

via Userbeam Remailer

2004-10-24, 5:45 pm


In article <fa7b3f008bcd8436600c1917b46d5bd0@dizum.com>
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> maybe you disagree. Your favorite?


If I told you I'd have to kill you.


---------------------------------
This message was sent through an anonymizing remailer
and did NOT originate from the sender address above!

Nomen Nescio

2004-10-24, 8:45 pm

From: via Userbeam Remailer <remailer@userbeam.net>
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at <admin@userbeam.de>.
Cc: mail2news@freedom.gmsociety.org
References: <fa7b3f008bcd8436600c1917b46d5bd0@dizum.com>
X-No-Archive: Yes
Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: Re: Opinion: BigApple is the best remailer overall
Message-ID: < 5fbdf861dffbbe79e5417097691f86ff@userbea
m.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 22:27:17 +0200 (CEST)
* -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.0000]
* 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@dizum.com
Organization: mail2news@dizum.com

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@

What kind of loging or tracking headers are these?

* -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.0000]
* 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Is Userbeam really Elbash/bog in disguise?

Thor Hammerman

2004-10-25, 5:45 pm

Nomen Nescio wrote:

> What kind of loging or tracking headers are these?
>
> * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
> * [score: 0.0000]
> * 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list


The good kind. The spam thing should have given it away, and a quick
Google could have taught you a lot about the meaning of Bayesian.

> Is Userbeam really Elbash/bog in disguise?


Is your tin hat too tight?

--
( .. ) Thor Hammerman http://thor.jungleman.info
-ooO-()-Ooo- thor@ifyoucantfigureitoutidontwantyourem
ailanyway.duh
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com