| Author |
Same Remop at XXXX.ath.cx? (#2)
|
|
| An Metet 2004-09-27, 5:45 pm |
| XXXX.ath.cx = Bikikii (cpunk + mix) & Userbeam (mix)
Are these two the run by the same Remop/Admin?
| |
| emperor 2004-09-28, 7:53 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In article < 9393589554d3e9953def5d01aa80a422@aonymou
s.poster>
An Metet <anmetet@liberty.gmsociety.org> wrote:
>XXXX.ath.cx = Bikikii (cpunk + mix) & Userbeam (mix)
>
>Are these two the run by the same Remop/Admin?
No, probably not.
"ath.cx" is one of the selectable domains from a dynamic DNS
service. Check out http://www.dyndns.org/ for more details.
*** emperor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/ AwUBQVlnSzk6FTOF+YXVEQIAagCg+YffBrwJZfYS
d1UIbxJ0iwjAFzgAoJ8M
jHXYEdsr4fgduzD7Pa+k8nFZ
=usXf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| BiKiKii Admin 2004-09-28, 5:45 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, An Metet wrote:
>XXXX.ath.cx = Bikikii (cpunk + mix) & Userbeam (mix)
>
>Are these two the run by the same Remop/Admin?
NO
BiKiKii
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBQVnFWPRwi/QFFzi5AQFNdAf/YrxGP9zfeEj4Ocmmyp25rpH6BTxQEAeq
quzt8eYwnZ7RpsDKncG5tJPO4ipnFgU34wxNVsIm
ZKwwtEPfYu7yglbTAi67IWzp
sRX6HAVl9Gdf2p7QiPDiohfV3PiY8qvHeYniYSe+
17XdASE3UmOYEJK8rWEaBOw2
6hgDKj+j1VVEGTuAs9WCU0mQMKBjmxTG+9st8bEx
WiXpD3vb72XFweXSI0IUGoC+
EqjcjiNUehcRklj3fUJDVIlwcZ1vGfdt6WiKSoXh
suXFpwbYqqXQFgwWSsPrWSNz
5JQqzfYtQtF2FxENwZzSniIq9JrHoQ/10A0kkX0JoP0nwJpjMLKaaw==
=ooyO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|