| enigma 2005-01-08, 5:45 pm |
|
"Josh Mandel" <JMandel@nym.alias.net> wrote in message
news:1105218186. a2d460415220b6ea6b580bdf657b36b4@meganet
news2...
> Whussup Enigma! Long time no talk.
>
> I agree, not a bad service. I think its funny that anytime someone
> chimes in to recommend a pay service they like, they are automatically
> branded as owners of that service thus being "spammers". If none can
> offeropinions, whats the use to begin with?
>
> Seems privacy.li might have left a bad taste in everyones mouth, not
> everyone is like privacy.li
Hi there Josh, happy New Year, all the best to you and yours! I hope you
had a great holiday.
I agree, nothing wrong with posting info. I've had good experiences with
privacy.li, I still use them,
but would recomend findnot as well, they get back to customer inquires
quickly, and fix any problems right away.
The one thing they do that's different than .li is that they give more
subscription options, .li only has the one year package, findnot gives all
kind of sign-up ability, and you can pay almost any way. Wow, what a plug,
I hope the trollers stay away! lol
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> enigma wrote:
check[vbcol=seagreen]
|