|
| " + krp !" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
>"AD" <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote in message
>news:QN35WH6638634.1316666667@reece.net.au...
>
>
>
> Sure I do. I know what I need to know is that 99% of the use of
>Remailers is for HARASSMENT by underdeveloped little punks who need to
>COMPENSATE for their TOTAL lack of MANHOOD by abusing people with anonymous
>remailers! THAT behavior says all that needs to be said about them.
Please provide proof for your 99% statistic.
We have remailer operators who process 200,000 messages through their
remailers in a month, and get maybe one or two complaints, if any. Hardly
99%.
Of course you once falsely claimed to be affiliated with EFF, too.
>
>
>
> Yeah right TURN it around. Do you think that SELLS? REALLY
I see you ducked the question, predictably. Why do you need to know
someone's snailmail address on usenet?
>
>
> Oh let's see now a few REMOPS have tried to prevent their systems from
A few? Try "one remop". And one who has been repeatedly drummed out of
the remailer community for his unethical behavior.
>being used to HARASS people and what happens? the WRATH of the PSYCHO
>remailer users turns on them, which pretty well PROVES my point that a good
>many of the users are psychopaths! The arrests and convictions of Kiddie
>Porn rings using remailers proves the other point. And not just in America
>but elsewhere in the world as well. NOT a great crowd to BRAG about hanging
>around with!
Please provide a single cite of such an arrest and/or conviction. I say
that you are lying.
|
|