Anonymous Servers - Re: Apologies from REAL remop for Eelbash

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > October 2005 > Re: Apologies from REAL remop for Eelbash





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Apologies from REAL remop for Eelbash
AD

2005-10-13, 5:54 pm

"* krp !=" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
><anonymous@remailer.hastio.org> wrote in message
>news:BZJMPFLL38637.8837152778@anonymous.poster...
>
>
>
>Sure go to Moore's www.aboutkenpangborn.com then look for his post
>"DISGRACE" that he attributes to me. You'll find it doesn't exist.


Are you referring to http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/racism.html which
reproduces a 1997 post with full headers?

Nothing indicating a remailer appears anywhere in the post. Where is your
proof that some guy is forging your ID through a remailer, and then putting
it on a website?


>
>Now here is what you are confronted with. Moore claims I had it NUKED. But
>Google's rules are that the request to delete a post must come from the
>account that posted it. IF as is maintained here my AOL account was TOS'd -
>then I would not do that, could I? So either I still have my AOL account OR
>the claim is false. So either Moore is lying when he claims to have had my
>AOL account yanked, OR he's lying about me NUKING the post. I never made it.


IMO you're trying to smokescreen. The post you are talking about on the
website was made in late 1997. Your termination from AOL, which you
confirmed on usenet at http://makeashorterlink.com/?J151359FB, was in 2000.
That would give you nearly three years to nuke the post.

Couple other things, the page on the website also does provide a compelling
link to a couple Google-archived posts where you commented on the original
post's content, but didn't deny making the post. And there is also the
fact that you seem to have no problem with lying. In your previous post I
caught you lying about the Replay remop addressing Congress in 1995.



>He claims it proves I wanted a woman raped... Even what he has doesn't
>really say that.


I would agree with you on this, kook. But you would be better off just
sticking to that story rather than, as it appears, trying to deny that you
made the post.














Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com