Anonymous Servers - to min, seriously

Author

to min, seriously

anon

2005-10-26, 2:46 am

i read in some groups you post to, like here, and in the sci hierarchy . my question is, why don’t you ever reply to the aussie “ buffoon ” that stalks you so much ?

just curious .
anon

zod

2005-10-26, 7:46 am

"anon" <anon@anon> wrote in message
news:H3DL4IKD38651.4878703704@reece.net.au...
>
>
>
>
> i read in some groups you post to, like here, and in the sci
> hierarchy . my question is, why don't you ever reply to the aussie "
> buffoon " that stalks you so much ?
>
>
> just curious .
> anon

NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.9.247.77 (?)

Anonymous

2005-10-26, 5:47 pm

On 26 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:
> i read in some groups you post to, like here, and in the sci hierarchy .
>my question is, why don't you ever reply to the aussie " buffoon " that stalks
>you so much ?
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hmmm...

Firstly, I'm not sure *why* you're inquiring? May-haps
you're confederated with the aforesaid liberals who've
been spreading absurd disinformation about your humble
correspondent for years now--most especially since the
7 November 2000 election when Bush was elected but not
elected--precisely as I'd stated; not predicted, but I
clearly stated that that's what would happen and so it
did; not because little old (humble) me stated it, but
rather because reality is foreordained by the Gods--as
the prophets of old and latter days have of one unique
voice pronounced all along. *All* Truth comes from God.

Then when President Bush was (re)elected on 2 November
2004, these rabidly anti-Christ, anti-American liberal
lunatics went off the deep end...well-beyond the point
of no return. Psychiatrists diagnosed their hopelessly-
suicidal syndrome as "PEST" or Post-Election Selection
Trauma, which is a very real, incurable and ultimately
fatal mental disorder--exclusive to left-wing liberals.

Of course--as the Google Groups' archives prove beyond
refutation--I unambiguously stated that President Bush
would be decisively elected over Hanoi John Kerry, and
so that's exactly what happened--again, no thanks owed
to me, but only to God eternal, the heavenly father of
all, the divine and illimitable Author of the Universe.

So you see, because the left-wing liberal losers *HATE*
God and His Son Jesus Christ, they *HATE* the ekklesia
of God i.e. as many who in fact love God and therefore
love our neighbors as our-selves (as Cayce called "the
other self") regardless of his or her worldly religion,
race, nationality, ideology, ad infinitum. That's what
the liberals *HATE* the most: God's Love for us and our
love for God. That's why we're destined to dominate the
whole Earth under the eternal and unassailable reign of
the Dominant one of heaven: the Emperor of the Universe.

As for why I don't talk to my veritable legion of inept
critics, I use layers of usenet browser kill-filtering,
including Hamster, which is context-sensitive. Any post
containing certain offending words and/or phrases are
permanently kill-filed, and I never see them--save for
the few times I search messages on Google Groups. See?

Disinformation, obfuscation and diversion tactics used
by the ever-more desperate liberal press has entangled
them into a downward spiral they'll NEVER recover from.

Like Bill O'Reilly and other (moderate-to-conservative)
super-successful media anchors have observed, they get
constantly hammered by "bad" press of left-wing liberal
smear merchants (e.g. move-on, media-matters ad nauseam)
funded by viciously anti-American nutcases George Soros
& those of his ultra-left-wing, liberal anarchistic ilk.

But as the conservatives are discovering there's really
no such thing as "bad" press per se. Unlike the liberal
press, conservatives rely on the independent-mindedness
and God-given conscientiousness of our astute readership
to decide who's who and what's what. Thus I do the same.
I don't care what liberals think or say about me at all.
They lie when the facts work better. They can't help it.
They have NO clairvoyant vision: as the present, past &
future mutually attests. So let these "dead dogs" lie...

Enjoy Life! (fillet a liberal for lunch)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup...arch=0x2B1CCFE7

*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/

*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?sel...nonymous.poster

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQ1+asJljD7YrHM/ nEQJUbACfTMm7lP2y+DwcJkAAPuIlu0PbJV8An0o
M
dKujWG7y1Su7tXDY36gY4omT
=vbW8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Anonymous

2005-10-26, 5:47 pm

In article <KOK7OQI538651.5396759259@anonymous.poster>
Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
> On 26 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Hmmm...
>
> Firstly, I'm not sure *why* you're inquiring?

To prove your a scumbag.

Thrasher Remailer

2005-10-26, 8:46 pm

In article <435f7509$0$74291$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net>
"zod" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.9.247.77 (?)

C'mon, figure it out yourself.

anon

2005-10-28, 5:30 pm

In message <KOK7OQI538651.5396759259@anonymous.poster>,
Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>On 26 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:
><s>

i’m not the aussie “ buffoon ,” but you answered my question . thanx .

i have another question . if you said george bush would win the elections before it happened, can you show proof you did this ?

if so, i wonder =how= you did it . does a “ god ” tell you, like in words, or mental pictures ? i believe in the super natural, but how any body can just “ state ” the future like it already happend ? that seems scary to me .

seriously curious,
anon

Anonymous

2005-10-28, 5:30 pm

On 28 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:
>In message <KOK7OQI538651.5396759259@anonymous.poster>,
>Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
> i'm not the aussie " buffoon ," but you answered my question . thanx .
> i have another question . if you said george bush would win the
>elections before it happened, can you show proof you did this ?
> if so, i wonder =how= you did it . does a " god " tell you, like in
>words, or mental pictures ? i believe in the super natural, but how any
>body can just " state " the future like it already happend ? that seems scary
>to me .
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Okay. Let's say for the moment that I'm convinced you're
*not* the offending, snivelling liberal lout in question;
lucky you. I'd say more, but we'll let the DEAD DOGS lie. :-D

"Scary"? That depends on your point of view--and personal
experience. When I discovered that the left-wing liberals
were socio-political and religious TOAST fast-approaching
worldwide extinction I was doing cartwheels! Anything BUT
scary from my point of view. To me it's a divine blessing.
I see & hear it by lucid dreaming, either asleep or awake;
often both. I live it, I breathe it, and I'll die with it.

As for proof, most important is that God knows what I did.
The fact that anyone can search the Google Groups archive
for time & date-stamped articles proving to my readership
precisely what I did--and did not--write is just icing on
the proverbial cake. I've written & posted many thousands
of articles and replies to popular groups since March '98;
MANY hundreds of which are specific regarding the present,
albeit my early attempts at translating my visions tended
to be unspecific...in earliest instances failing accuracy,
for which I blame only myself for having been deceived by
left-wing liberal misleaders whom I supposed in authority.
If you wonder who I'm talking about, search Google Groups.

My many critics immediately started naming me as "prophet"
even though I've never attributed such illustrious titles
to myself nor to any other but the source of all prophecy.
With a little practice my seeing became more accurate and
specific: I'm but a humble seer, an anonymous clairvoyant
seeing three screens: thus focusing the one in the middle.
The better I got at this the more accurate my translation
of visions became... but again, my earliest attempts were.
Once I got the hang of it, I adapted my vision accurately.

For an early success, I repeatedly stated that Clinton is
the last *elected* American President ever to hold office.
Bush was not elected, but was appointed amid a hopelessly-
deadlocked election. Like it or not, that's what happened.
Was it a 'Skull & Bones' ploy? Maybe, I'm not complaining.

E.g. HOURS before the 2000 election I posted the following
article entitled "GW", & dated "7 Nov 2000 03:22:57 -0000":

http://groups.google.com/groups?sel...nonymous.poster

Here's the literal interlinear translation of it verbatim:

> busc sors, non inaugurare,
"Busc" the oracular response, not consecrated by augury,

> in augurium non *passim.
but according to the augur who is not here and there.

*i.e., not duplicitous, neither equivocal; utterly certain.

But of course, my inept critics will say that "GW Busc" is
somehow too enigmatic, ambiguous or amphibolic, ad nauseam,
to possibly mean *GW Bush* on the very day of the election.
By "7 Nov 2000 19:21:08 -0000" that same day I posted this
article entitled "President-Elect's Natal Chart" (GW Bush):

http://groups.google.com/groups?sel...nonymous.poster

That's President-elect...not elected-President. Understand?
As we see, because George W. Bush was eventually appointed-
not-elected President, his inauguration was not sanctified
over the glaring hanging and dimpled chads down in Florida.
The election was broken beyond repair; remedy was in store.
Ask any liberal--ask Google's Senior Advisor *Al Gore*--if
they feel that GW Bush was legitimately elected to office?
You'll notice the deafening silence drumming from the left. :-D

Finally, as for the 2002 mid-term elections and great 2004
(re)election of President George Walker Bush, with the all-
encompassing destruction---really, self-implosion---of the
liberal Democrats who hijacked the party and took them all
down with them irrecoverably--read irredeemably--in flames,
simply search Google Groups archive for "Daniel Joseph Min":

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%...afe=on&num=100&

You'll find nearly twenty THOUSAND posts more or less that
consistently prove that I stated the 2004 election clearly
and for many months *before* the fact. In virtually every
post, I remind readers of the liberals' unenviable destiny,
either explicitly else by inference all teaching the truth.
Just look at my posts in the months before 2 November 2004:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%...1&as_maxy=2004&

So you do the math. Either you acknowledge that I foretold
the elections very much as they happened, or else you deny
the facts of the matter. I don't care either way. Only God
is the Father of all, the Master of all, and Author of all.

Enjoy Life! (fillet a liberal for lunch)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup...arch=0x2B1CCFE7

*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.danieljosephmin.netfirms.com/

*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?sel...nonymous.poster

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQ2G/IpljD7YrHM/nEQI5HgCeJFSlbZVoUM/M7ZWEzGqdhfDlowIAn0Fz
zVNLFw0hHutV5kY7n9sGDH/h
=hB4y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer

2005-10-28, 5:30 pm

In article <A156HY5Y38653.1415625@anonymous.poster>
nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid (Anonymous) wrote:
>
> On 28 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Okay.

alt.XXXXXXX.daniel-joseph-min