|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > November 2005 > RPM Package for mixmaster?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
RPM Package for mixmaster?
|
|
| Fake Name 2005-11-11, 5:48 pm |
|
****************************************
*
The message below came through a remailer.
Take that into account as you read the message.
****************************************
*
I have started running an rpm-based version of linux (it is pclinuxos -
very good so far, except it is missing a few apps compared to the debian
system I was using earlier).
It doesn't have mixmaster. Any rpm version of it around?
****************************************
*
The message above came through a remailer.
The From address is probably a fake.
Take that into account as you read the message.
****************************************
*
| |
| Anonymous Sender 2005-11-11, 5:48 pm |
| In article <TG2S6TBN38667.6593981481@anonymous.poster>
Fake Name <bounce@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>
>
> ****************************************
*
>
> The message below came through a remailer.
> Take that into account as you read the message.
>
> ****************************************
*
>
> I have started running an rpm-based version of linux (it is pclinuxos -
> very good so far, except it is missing a few apps compared to the debian
> system I was using earlier).
>
> It doesn't have mixmaster. Any rpm version of it around?
>
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************
*
>
> The message above came through a remailer.
>
> The From address is probably a fake.
>
> Take that into account as you read the message.
>
> ****************************************
*
Header AND footer disclaimers?
AAAAGH!
| |
| Stray Cat 2005-11-11, 5:48 pm |
| I've never seen a RPM of Mixmaster, but it would be trivial to come up
with one using, for example, a packager like CheckInstall.
| |
| privacy.at Anonymous Remailer 2005-11-12, 7:46 am |
|
In article < d85c17c8a94848754c18a6f37613c81d@remaile
r.metacolo.com>
Anonymous Sender <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
>
> Header AND footer disclaimers?
>
> AAAAGH!
And he changes those headers daily. I shouldn't
complain though; more money for Jeffrey.
| |
| nonalt 2005-11-12, 5:46 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, "privacy.at Anonymous Remailer"
<mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>In article < d85c17c8a94848754c18a6f37613c81d@remaile
r.metacolo.com>
>Anonymous Sender <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
>
>And he changes those headers daily. I shouldn't
>complain though; more money for Jeffrey.
Except for the fact that eelbash admin is without honor. He won't make good
on the bet. He's just a reprobate, a welsher. He has no honor, therefore,
is not trustworthy, either.
Eelbash admin, the deadbeat admin. I'll bet he doesn't pay his other bills,
either. Maybe that's why eelbash goes up and down all the time, from
providers cutting off service for non-payment.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/ AwUBQ3Yvl2XzKKMKCjVPEQJ+PgCgzKrRg+INfx8r
nve2rkLoBG9PgsEAoLPI
dqdbuSDmJpI89xTg5PZ7f3zM
=RQ4u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|
|