Anonymous Servers - Re: TOR: why not really secure yet? Because it isn't

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > November 2005 > Re: TOR: why not really secure yet? Because it isn't





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: TOR: why not really secure yet? Because it isn't
PeeWee

2005-11-25, 5:47 pm

On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:07:14 +0000 (UTC), Zax
<fleegle@bananasplit.info> wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA512
>
>On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:27:09 -0800 (PST), A.Melon wrote in
>Message-Id: < 1e8fee189ad4c2eda4ce8a010f4c828a@melontr
affickers.com>:
>
>
>Undiscovered flaws are a possibility, but at the moment nobody has really
>performed any extensive testing to prove its degree of anonymity under
>various conditions and attacks. Just like a new cipher, the experts are
>wary of calling it "strong" until it's been exposed to lots of analysis.
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEVAwUBQ4bUQmoLu9HNUqmMAQqbuwf+IhOrTaf1
oVngHoLF0/1ONUX7+l7VOXEr
>gRYd7F7u2gcax8nZwwpQ1TeKi+kPfcipKG2/kVZTNQF2RXJkmu55GJ5ZGvUzR9u8
>MjUoN82REqKoOEqBn/SCVu/YWQo0ZzP1/8PNS4bZr6TioCdHlJPNYf8RZqZvkWF/
> PzVE+iDOpzk3u8dLn8beRlYCb2q4xFj5jqG4dBgz
jP9MJdSRkJDaqh0yIviUTP4k
>gF2o0d+P7iDB6JL21/ hGebPqw3MVdcTdRMcBU8bPcu9VRIxYsvUYO2BNi6
aFnxYV
> +R7XfqDNyyWi1bQle0zYcRDQlTzpVrLu2SpWcoPx
XtNybVNoEUssQg==
>=9QIa
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


It's ok at present, but I ran across one of those bogus Evid E sites
that traced me home. Definitely not strong anon yet.

--
PW
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com