Anonymous Servers - Dangers of Remailers

Author

Dangers of Remailers

A Friend

2005-02-14, 5:45 pm

The truth about RProcess

RProcess was not an individual as most think. It's a code name for a team of
programmers. They produced programs like Potato, JBN1, JBN2, Reliable, and
others. This was done for the NSC, CIA, and FBI. The anonymous community was
grateful for an easy way of secure communications, no more hand rolling and
manual encrypting. They even released the source code, proving how safe their
programs were.(NOT) A group from the UK discovered discrepancies in the
coding. When RProcess was confronted the team was quickly disbanded. This
fact, and that the FBI runs most remailer today put you in great danger.

Warning on the use of PGP. Since the takeover by Symantec PGP has some very
suspicious code. The risk of using the program is way to high.

Some foolish individuals will mock the warning, but this is aimed at the
serious minded.

A.Melon

2005-02-14, 5:45 pm

In article <cur7nh$upt$1@domitilla.aioe.org>
afriend@forprivacy.net (A Friend) wrote:
>
> The truth about RProcess
>

Flush!

Anonymous

2005-02-14, 5:45 pm

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, afriend@forprivacy.net (A Friend) wrote:
>The truth about RProcess
>
>RProcess was not an individual as most think. It's a code name for a team of
>programmers. They produced programs like Potato, JBN1, JBN2, Reliable, and
>others. This was done for the NSC, CIA, and FBI. The anonymous community was
>grateful for an easy way of secure communications, no more hand rolling and
>manual encrypting. They even released the source code, proving how safe their
>programs were.(NOT) A group from the UK discovered discrepancies in the
>coding. When RProcess was confronted the team was quickly disbanded. This
>fact, and that the FBI runs most remailer today put you in great danger.
>
>Warning on the use of PGP. Since the takeover by Symantec PGP has some very
>suspicious code. The risk of using the program is way to high.
>
>Some foolish individuals will mock the warning, but this is aimed at the
>serious minded.

Uh huh. The foolish individuals would be the ones who don't accept you
completely unsubstantiated word for this, and ask for a little proof? Just
a touch of evidence? Code sample, maybe?

You're just a liar, and the "serious minded" can tell.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

Daniel Joseph Min

2005-02-15, 2:45 am

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, afriend@forprivacy.net (A Friend) wrote:
>The truth about RProcess
>RProcess was not an individual as most think. It's a code name for a team of
>programmers. They produced programs like Potato, JBN1, JBN2, Reliable, and
>others. This was done for the NSC, CIA, and FBI. The anonymous community was
>grateful for an easy way of secure communications, no more hand rolling and
>manual encrypting. They even released the source code, proving how safe their
>programs were.(NOT) A group from the UK discovered discrepancies in the
>coding. When RProcess was confronted the team was quickly disbanded. This
>fact, and that the FBI runs most remailer today put you in great danger.
>Warning on the use of PGP. Since the takeover by Symantec PGP has some very
>suspicious code. The risk of using the program is way to high.
>Some foolish individuals will mock the warning, but this is aimed at the
>serious minded.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

The primary purpose of the generally-speaking anonymous remailers
is to facilitate, encourage and promote freespeech while making it
vastly more difficult for the anti-freespeech "net-cop" left-wing
liberal terrorists to harass those who speak freely (much thanks
to the PGP/Mix inventors and programmers and the remailer sysops)
by flooding the free-speaker's ISP(s) with frivolous innuendo and
the usual liberal extremist disinformation and obfuscation tactics.

Anyone who believes that PGP/Mix or other military-grade encrypted
messages and their authors are magically "exempt" from government
decryption and surveillance, respectively, then they're misinformed.

Thank God that our FBI, CIA, HLS, NSA et al US government agencies
are keeping close tabs on left-wing criminals and other potential
terrorists around the clock, and very aggressively. We are at WAR!
So we need to make sure that the Anti-American liberal terrorists
(e.g. Ward Churchill, Usama Bin Laden, John Kerry, Michael Moore)
are constantly under close scrutiny by federal law-enforcement and
intelligence assets lest the liberals compromise national security
and bring about the downfall of these United States of America.

So you see, the ONLY people in danger from the US Government are
the Anti-American liberal terrorists who are aiding and abetting
Al-Qaeda and other rabidly-insane genocidal murderers who hate us
and want to murder all law-abiding citizens throughout America and
across the free world. Thank GOD that the liberals are vulnerable
to government surveillance 24/7/365.2422 days per mean tropical year.

Remember, *ALL* liberals are Anti-American terrorists! Filth like
Ward Churchill are merely exemplary of the America-hating liberal
mindset. It is therefore imperative that our government maintains
VERY close surveillance of every left-wing liberal terrorist on the
planet. Because when the time comes to apprehend and interrogate
these liberal terrorists en masse (to wit, Patriot Act III), then
we need all the advantages that we can muster, including PGP/Mix
decryption technologies and every hi-tech weapon available to us.

In conclusion, every patriotic American and freespeech-advocate in
the world should be routinely using the remailers to post as many
e-mails and usenet blogs as you can to help us smoke out liberals,
to red-flag and identify them so the FBI etc. can take 'em out of
the loop--so to speak. Liberals are the ENEMY of freedom, so they
are in our federal gunsights. Rest assured, we're gonna KILL them.

Very Truly Yours,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.google.co.in/groups?selm...nonymous.poster
http://www.google.co.uk/groups?selm...nonymous.poster
http://groups.google.com/groups?sel...nonymous.poster
http://www.geocities.com/daniel_joseph_min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup...arch=0x2B1CCFE7

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQhFkXZljD7YrHM/nEQJ/fACg/Y09cQ/ZsGASBhqqvbp0ztxVWNcAn0vp
liIw09ED1BBKcqK9H4P3BM0B
=kS3J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

nemo outis

2005-02-15, 2:45 am

In article <BJ5M6S0F38398.4636458333@reece.net.au>, Daniel Joseph
Min <Real.Min@Colorado.USA> wrote:

Not a bad troll - as such things go. I'll give it a 4.

And I'll throw a little gasoline on the fire lest you be utterly
ignored and become depressed.

>Thank God that our FBI, CIA, HLS, NSA et al US government agencies
>are keeping close tabs on left-wing criminals and other potential
>terrorists around the clock, and very aggressively.

Hee! hee! hee! The FBI, the CIA, and the rest of that tawdry
alphabet soup of dysfunctionality? The keystone cops have more
credibility than those clowns!

>We are at WAR!

Bullshit! Congress - the only institution that CAN declare war -
hasn't declared one since 1941!

Regards,

A REAL Christian who follows Jesus

2005-02-15, 2:45 am

In article , Daniel Joseph Min wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, afriend@forprivacy.net (A Friend) wrote:

To the O.P.: Either prove your asinine claims with verifiable evidence or
STFU
[vbcol=seagreen]
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>The primary purpose of the generally-speaking anonymous remailers
>is to facilitate, encourage and promote freespeech while making it
>vastly more difficult for the anti-freespeech "net-cop" left-wing
>liberal terrorists to harass those who speak freely (much thanks
>to the PGP/Mix inventors and programmers and the remailer sysops)
>by flooding the free-speaker's ISP(s) with frivolous innuendo and
>the usual liberal extremist disinformation and obfuscation tactics.
>
>Anyone who believes that PGP/Mix or other military-grade encrypted
>messages and their authors are magically "exempt" from government
>decryption and surveillance, respectively, then they're misinformed.

YOU are misinformed if you think that PGP or Mixmaster crypto can be
cracked so easily that the government is reading it freely. They don't
have that much computer, or time, or money, or manpower.

>In conclusion, every patriotic American and freespeech-advocate in
>the world should be routinely using the remailers to post as many
>e-mails and usenet blogs as you can to help us smoke out liberals,
>to red-flag and identify them so the FBI etc. can take 'em out of
>the loop--so to speak. Liberals are the ENEMY of freedom, so they
>are in our federal gunsights. Rest assured, we're gonna KILL them.
>

You are no more a Christian than Saddam or Osama. With all your violent,
disrespectfull talk of killing you are an affront to the God you pretend to
claim. Not only that, but "people" like you give remailers a bad name.

Tell me, are YOU the idiot spamming salvation posts all over usenet?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

Anonymous via Panta Rhei

2005-02-15, 2:45 am

In article <pweQd.393762$8l.294718@pd7tw1no>, nemo outis wrote:
>In article <BJ5M6S0F38398.4636458333@reece.net.au>, Daniel Joseph
>Min <Real.Min@Colorado.USA> wrote:
>
>Not a bad troll - as such things go. I'll give it a 4.
>

on what scale? from the evidence i've seen, you must be talking about a
scale of 1 to 957.4^8387816

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

George Orwell

2005-02-15, 2:45 am

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, A Friend wrote:
>Warning on the use of PGP. Since the takeover by Symantec PGP has some very
>suspicious code. The risk of using the program is way to high.
>

Symantec has never been involved with Pretty Good Privacy.

>Some foolish individuals will mock the warning, but this is aimed at the
>serious minded.
>

Please let's get on to the polymophing DLL chapter.

We truely wish you would use a little more creative in your story telling.

Nomen Nescio

2005-02-16, 8:45 pm

Mr. Squirrel

2005-02-16, 8:45 pm

On 15 Feb 2005 03:07:39 -0000, Daniel Joseph Min
<Real.Min@Colorado.USA> wrote:

It is liberals and communists like me who built this country,
Mr. Minn; read your history.

Thomas J. Boschloo

2005-02-20, 5:46 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

A Friend wrote:

<snip>

| Warning on the use of PGP. Since the takeover by Symantec PGP has some
very
| suspicious code. The risk of using the program is way to high.

First it was owned by PGP Inc.
Version 5.5.5 was the first version by NAI
and 8.0 was by PGP Corporation.

Not sure about the precise name of PGP Inc., but you would be able to
see them by downloading and installing those versions..

Thomas
- --
"All my life, I've always wondered, What it would be like to fire a
ballistic missile" - Wonderfully colored plastic war toys, The Dead
Milkmen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQB5AwUBQhiAFwEP2l8iXKAJAQGapAMeKpGpdXmI
MdgvJEw1Hg+5HNCmEJLyuDjO
rZCmCghen0DMoYsH1xa9is7Q4q0B46eKd+zmHMBL
6l+t/xrmxy1T319ZO3o7z7qv
kfRYUu7zz1R/bUM4l08pjULs4EtBZbQ7XcNvtA==
=ri0s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----