| small fish 2005-03-16, 8:45 pm |
|
"Ronnie" <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote in message
news:WLZMSS0K38427.6705092593@anonymous...
> In article <1110668195.347239.43910@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
> Jabriol@excite.com wrote: Carol slips again using the remailer,
> and posting under JohnS:
>
> From: "JohnS" <J...@N.Net>
> Newsgroups:
> alt.religion.jehovahs-
> witn,alt.privacy,alt.talk.creationism,alt.free.newsservers
> References: <IIEL6Y8R38423.1728009259@anonymous>
> <42335106$0$1655$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com> => SNIP SHIT!
>
> Lemme see now you pro rapist scumbag. First you claim Cracklin'
> Rosie and JohnS are the very same person. But JS can't get his
> messages to go out using an anonymous remailer. He made than
> plain as day on another ng. Then you claim Cracklin' or Carol
> is posting hundreds of remailed messages, using a remailer. So
> she's not having a problem if that's true, is she?
No, "she" isn't, and speaking of yourself in the third person is k00kery,
Carol. *You* don't have a problem with remailers, and your "JohnS" sock
disappeared after learning to use a few more. Strawman argument denied.
> So which is
> it? Is she JS who can't use his remailer, or is she someone
> else? If they're the same person then Caracklin' isn't using a
> remailer. Are you confused again? Too much Cheap wine? Too
> much crack before you get on your conputer you porn freak? It
> must be hell with Cracklin' Carol living in your head 24/7/365
> for the past 10 years.
>
> You shouldn't have told my wife rape was normal and right. That
> women who aren't creationists are looking for it and deserve it.
>
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
>
>
>
>
|