|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > April 2005 > Stats for Parsifal Remailer?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Stats for Parsifal Remailer?
|
|
|
|
Have any remailer stats sources added the Parsifal remailer?
None of the sources I follow seem to have it.
.....
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
| |
| TheEelBasher 2005-04-04, 5:47 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 4 Apr 2005, Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Roy) wrote:
>Have any remailer stats sources added the Parsifal remailer?
>None of the sources I follow seem to have it.
And none of them will, either. Most remops resent being told that they are
children, with the implication that they are not fit to share the same
network as the mighty eelbash/assholeus. At least the ones that have some
spine feel that way.
XXXX eelbash, whatever he calls him/herself this week.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/ AwUBQlGbImDBv6yDhzHpEQIF+wCgrIbmx4+x1rde
dD8Ua60nE1bCCs0AnRIw
fwYhNfsNWkb2cYtbEONlS/i7
=cXkY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
|
|
| A.Melon 2005-04-04, 5:47 pm |
| In article <YN3LB0BU38446.6457175926@anonymous>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Roy) wrote:
>
> Have any remailer stats sources added the Parsifal remailer?
> None of the sources I follow seem to have it.
amigo's got it.
| |
|
| >>Have any remailer stats sources added the Parsifal remailer?
>
>And none of them will, either. Most remops resent being told that they are
>children, with the implication that they are not fit to share the same
>network as the mighty eelbash/assholeus.
Cite? Link?
| |
| TheEelBasher 2005-04-04, 8:45 pm |
| On 4 Apr 2005, Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Bruce) wrote:
>
>Cite? Link?
Sure. Just ask anyone who was in APA-S about 8 months to a year ago. It
was about the time he had decided that Austria and Dizum should be
delisted, for not operating the way he thought they should.
In the post below, the "quoted" words are from eelbash/assholeus:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>, Eelbash Admin
><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header>
>wrote:
>
In addition to this arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for the
delisting of Austria and Dizum. He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.
This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.
Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years" (a blatant, bald-faced
LIE).
So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".
He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.
So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.
His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above. If
you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring and
filtering behavior on past remailers he has run. The ones we know about
are:
eelbash
axloltl
axolotl2
cheshire
congo
bog
bogg
eelbash (again)
bushwa
greatwall
asmodeus
|
|
|
|
|