|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > April 2005 > "REAL" truth about RProcess
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
"REAL" truth about RProcess
|
|
|
| The real truth about RProcess
RProcess was not an individual as most think. It's a code name for a team of
programmers. They produced programs like Potato, JBN1, JBN2, Reliable, and
others. This was done for the NSC, CIA, and FBI. The anonymous community was
grateful for an easy way of secure communications, no more hand rolling and
manual encrypting. They even released the source code, proving how safe their
programs were.(NOT) A group from the UK discovered discrepancies in the
coding. When RProcess was confronted the team was quickly disbanded. This
fact, and that the FBI runs most remailer today put you in great danger.
Warning on the use of PGP. Since the takeover by Symantec PGP has some very
suspicious code. The risk of using the program is way to high.
Some foolish individuals will mock the warning, but this is aimed at the
serious minded.
Can you trust Remailers
What do you know about the various remailers, and can they be trusted? The
answer depends on your level of sophistication and intelligence. Most of you
have nothing to worry about, as you have nothing important to say. The very
few who are serious need to use extreme caution. See my post on RProcess
| |
| George Orwell 2005-04-04, 5:47 pm |
| On 30 Mar 2005, 4U@home.com (4U) wrote:
>The real truth about RProcess
>
>RProcess was not an individual as most think. It's a code name for a team of
>programmers. They produced programs like Potato, JBN1, JBN2, Reliable, and
>others. This was done for the NSC, CIA, and FBI. The anonymous community was
>grateful for an easy way of secure communications, no more hand rolling and
>manual encrypting. They even released the source code, proving how safe their
>programs were.(NOT) A group from the UK discovered discrepancies in the
>coding. When RProcess was confronted the team was quickly disbanded. This
>fact, and that the FBI runs most remailer today put you in great danger.
>
>Warning on the use of PGP. Since the takeover by Symantec PGP has some very
>suspicious code. The risk of using the program is way to high.
>
>Some foolish individuals will mock the warning, but this is aimed at the
>serious minded.
>
>Can you trust Remailers
>
>What do you know about the various remailers, and can they be trusted? The
>answer depends on your level of sophistication and intelligence. Most of you
>have nothing to worry about, as you have nothing important to say. The very
>few who are serious need to use extreme caution. See my post on RProcess
You are an XXXXXXX. Shut the XXXX up. No one believes you or wants to read
your shit. XXXX off XXXXXXX.
|
|
|
|
|