|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > May 2005 > Attention Dizum Admin
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Attention Dizum Admin
|
|
| Nomen Nescio 2005-04-26, 2:46 am |
| In case you don't know, Dizum m2n has unusual long latency. Reliability
lower than usual. Messages have time stamp many hours earlier than when
appear on news server. Been going on for a week or more.
Thanks for your service.
| |
| Anonymous 2005-04-26, 5:46 pm |
| Could not last for ever. Been one of the best for years.
| |
| Userbeam Remailer 2005-04-26, 5:46 pm |
| In article <1114540690.237985.236090@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
"Anonymous" <yardleymj@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
> Could not last for ever. Been one of the best for years.
Hey Mike,
Why include van.general when you snipped the original post in its entirety?
Do you know how stupid that makes you look?
| |
| Alex de Joode 2005-04-27, 7:45 am |
| Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
: In case you don't know, Dizum m2n has unusual long latency. Reliability
: lower than usual. Messages have time stamp many hours earlier than when
: appear on news server. Been going on for a week or more.
: Thanks for your service.
I noticed it yesterday when my email reply to an other person didn't
show up as fast as expected (must say it does cool down an argument
you have with someone ;)).
Anyhow it turned out the mailq at dizum was about 500Mb, I've
changed some stuff on how email will be delivered (ie wrong
mail is sent to /dev/null in stead of bounced to the sender,
which in most cases is fake), unfortunately it seems I forgot
to add the mail2news@ and mail2news_nospam@ aliases to the list of
allowed addresses so if you used those between yesterday 17:00CET
and todat 14:00CET your message is mostlikly lost.
My apologies for any inconvenicnce caused.
(As the mailq is doen to about 117Mb turn-a-round times should
improve substancially).
Also if you notice something broke, please mail me at the above
address so i can fix a.s.a.p.
Cheers,
Alex
| |
| Italy Anonymous Remailer 2005-04-27, 7:45 am |
| In article <d4nv24$koh$1@heroin.sabotage.org>
adejoode+usenet@sabotage.org (Alex de Joode) wrote:
>
> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> : In case you don't know, Dizum m2n has unusual long latency. Reliability
> : lower than usual. Messages have time stamp many hours earlier than when
> : appear on news server. Been going on for a week or more.
>
> : Thanks for your service.
>
> I noticed it yesterday when my email reply to an other person didn't
> show up as fast as expected (must say it does cool down an argument
> you have with someone ;)).
>
> Anyhow it turned out the mailq at dizum was about 500Mb, I've
> changed some stuff on how email will be delivered (ie wrong
> mail is sent to /dev/null in stead of bounced to the sender,
> which in most cases is fake), unfortunately it seems I forgot
> to add the mail2news@ and mail2news_nospam@ aliases to the list of
> allowed addresses so if you used those between yesterday 17:00CET
> and todat 14:00CET your message is mostlikly lost.
Bouncing it during the SMTP session (i.e. refusing it after RCPT
TO will be even more efficient than accepting the whole
message and then discarding it.
| |
| Alex de Joode 2005-04-27, 5:46 pm |
| Italy Anonymous Remailer <nobody@see.comments.header> wrote:
: In article <d4nv24$koh$1@heroin.sabotage.org>
: adejoode+usenet@sabotage.org (Alex de Joode) wrote:
: >
: > Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
: > : In case you don't know, Dizum m2n has unusual long latency. Reliability
: > : lower than usual. Messages have time stamp many hours earlier than when
: > : appear on news server. Been going on for a week or more.
: >
: > : Thanks for your service.
: >
: > I noticed it yesterday when my email reply to an other person didn't
: > show up as fast as expected (must say it does cool down an argument
: > you have with someone ;)).
: >
: > Anyhow it turned out the mailq at dizum was about 500Mb, I've
: > changed some stuff on how email will be delivered (ie wrong
: > mail is sent to /dev/null in stead of bounced to the sender,
: > which in most cases is fake), unfortunately it seems I forgot
: > to add the mail2news@ and mail2news_nospam@ aliases to the list of
: > allowed addresses so if you used those between yesterday 17:00CET
: > and todat 14:00CET your message is mostlikly lost.
: Bouncing it during the SMTP session (i.e. refusing it after RCPT
: TO will be even more efficient than accepting the whole
: message and then discarding it.
Correct, but for some domains for which I act as secondary mx that
is not possible, also the remailer dumps a lot of messages to invalid
domains/users in the mailq which postfix tries to deliver for a week
orso.
Cheers,
-aj-
| |
| Italy Anonymous Remailer 2005-04-27, 5:46 pm |
| On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 Alex de Joode wrote:
>Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>: In case you don't know, Dizum m2n has unusual long latency. Reliability
>: lower than usual. Messages have time stamp many hours earlier than when
>: appear on news server. Been going on for a week or more.
>
>: Thanks for your service.
>
>I noticed it yesterday when my email reply to an other person didn't
>show up as fast as expected (must say it does cool down an argument
>you have with someone ;)).
>
>Anyhow it turned out the mailq at dizum was about 500Mb, I've
>changed some stuff on how email will be delivered (ie wrong
>mail is sent to /dev/null in stead of bounced to the sender,
>which in most cases is fake), unfortunately it seems I forgot
>to add the mail2news@ and mail2news_nospam@ aliases to the list of
>allowed addresses so if you used those between yesterday 17:00CET
>and todat 14:00CET your message is mostlikly lost.
>
>My apologies for any inconvenicnce caused.
>
>(As the mailq is doen to about 117Mb turn-a-round times should
> improve substancially).
>
>Also if you notice something broke, please mail me at the above
>address so i can fix a.s.a.p.
>
>Cheers,
>Alex
Thanks very much, Alex. :-)
Is the "above address" the one in the headers? adejoode+usenet <at>
sabotage <dot> org
| |
| Italy Anonymous Remailer 2005-05-01, 5:48 pm |
| In article <5T6J9RYO38469.6201851852@anonymous.poster>
nobody@See.Comments.Header (Italy Anonymous Remailer) wrote:
>
> In article <d4nv24$koh$1@heroin.sabotage.org>
> adejoode+usenet@sabotage.org (Alex de Joode) wrote:
>
> Bouncing it during the SMTP session (i.e. refusing it after RCPT
> TO will be even more efficient than accepting the whole
> message and then discarding it.
Alternatively, use something like this for Exim4 (should be
something similar available for other programs:
Q0040: How can I stop undeliverable bounce messages (e.g. to
routeable, but undeliverable, spammer senders) from clogging up
the queue for days?
A0040: If at all possible, you should try to avoid getting into
this situation in the first place, for example, by verifying
recipients so that you do not accept undeliverable messages that
lead to these bounces. You can, however, configure Exim to
discard failing bounce messages early. Just set
ignore_bounce_errors_after to specify a (short) time to keep
them for.
| |
| Alex de Joode 2005-05-01, 5:48 pm |
| Italy Anonymous Remailer <nobody@see.comments.header> wrote:
[..]
: Alternatively, use something like this for Exim4 (should be
: something similar available for other programs:
: Q0040: How can I stop undeliverable bounce messages (e.g. to
: routeable, but undeliverable, spammer senders) from clogging up
: the queue for days?
: A0040: If at all possible, you should try to avoid getting into
: this situation in the first place, for example, by verifying
: recipients so that you do not accept undeliverable messages that
: lead to these bounces. You can, however, configure Exim to
: discard failing bounce messages early. Just set
: ignore_bounce_errors_after to specify a (short) time to keep
: them for.
Postfix is the flavor here ;)
Cheers,
-aj-
| |
|
|
Alex de Joode wrote:
>Also if you notice something broke, please mail me at the above
>address so i can fix a.s.a.p.
Well, here is a new issue. The 2 mail2news addresses for dizum with
hashcash in the name have been missing from the quicksilver
compendium ( http://www.quicksilvermail.net/mail2news.html )
since April 26.
user
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
|
|
|
|
|