|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > May 2005 > PING Bikikii admin
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
PING Bikikii admin
|
|
| Apple2Admin 2005-05-03, 8:45 pm |
| Do you need to whitelist me or should I just remove you from my remailer?
This is all I've been getting from you for the past 2 weeks now.
open (216.80.113.74) 32s failed A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. 32 sec"
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
| |
| BiKiKii Admin 2005-05-03, 8:45 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 3 May 2005, Apple2Admin wrote:
>Do you need to whitelist me or should I just remove you from my remailer?
>This is all I've been getting from you for the past 2 weeks now.
>open (216.80.113.74) 32s failed A connection attempt failed because the
>connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established
>connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. 32 sec"
>
Hello!
What is the IP of your Outbound SMTP server?
69.119.201.173 ?
I whitelisted the above and included 69.119.201.0/24 in session logging for diagnostic purposes.
The only reason I whitelist IPs is to not do transaction level filtering.
Those that do get rejected will receive a 554 error.
Users please note:
Below is an example of a transaction level filter applied at BiKiKii's SMTP
S, "*cumshot*", BS, "554 Rejected - No Dribble Here! - Message Refused."
Translation:
If Subject contains `cumshot'
Block the message and add the IP to the
Short term(30 minutes) block list and give the error
"554 Rejected - No Dribble Here! - Message Refused."
Please do advise.
Ciao!
BiKiKii
Checking 15 U.S. NameServers...
Domain: bigapple.dynalias.net
Domain Server: ns.mob.net
No MX found!
Domain Server: ns1.mcleodusa.net
No MX found!
Domain Server: vnsc-lc.sys.gtei.net
No MX found!
Domain Server: ns-1.iastate.edu
No MX found!
Domain Server: cache01.ns.uu.net
No MX found!
Domain Server: ns5.mci.net
No MX found!
Domain Server: nscache.prserv.net
No MX found!
Domain Server: ns2.mindspring.com
No MX found!
Domain Server: dns1.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net
No MX found!
Domain Server: ns2.us.dellhost.com
No MX found!
Domain Server: ns3.earthlink.net
No MX found!
Domain Server: ns.isi.edu
No MX found!
Domain Server: ns1.sprintlink.net
No MX found!
Domain Server: ns2.texas.rr.com
No MX found!
Domain Server: ns1.phx.us.opennic.glue
No MX found!
Checking Non-US NameServers...
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Domain Server: ns.telstra.net
No MX found!
Location: Seoul, Korea
Domain Server: ns.netpia.com
No MX found!
Location: Shanghai, China
Domain Server: dns1.cableplus.com.cn
No MX found!
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Domain Server: ns1.interplanet.com.mx
No MX found!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBQnekV/Rwi/QFFzi5AQFVxgf/SmEN4UBujAIpW6ehvXbVreeZr6IJk0Us
SFTHDFhrJefK/mXTDmae6/LBk9TptTjgfA/QmWiGHFpvfFN/O+77SfTxK8vZzqJ5
nLGdfc86CiB7AxUTAJff/dKUrgK5I9kOFCrQVa/tpQDi38U50sfqqNgyJ/t6K8YO
jIGShfhXwYtn/ ZyCQvcVQaZ4TZ94+1YJbtx7gArItgijJpHYFMfXW
l5srUooQXTx
xGjgGKYDGu7dD70cW3DH+Je02rZyvyNTOM9EjoSt
wXAwoKNJSU5leJ9/H3jsfaTo
Lh9w6ICCL0T/JqrFmDb7HQs8HW3cgGTEFDhp1FJ/snVYin7waCni+w==
=KlVq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Apple2Admin 2005-05-03, 8:45 pm |
| In article <1A131BC82EA0@bikikii.ath.cx>
BiKiKii Admin <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On 3 May 2005, Apple2Admin wrote:
>
>
> Hello!
>
> What is the IP of your Outbound SMTP server?
>
> 69.119.201.173 ?
Correct, but I'm still getting an error connecting to you.
03 13:21:20[196014] Later 127.0.0.1 <Apple2Remailer@bigapple.dynalias.net> <remail@bikikii.ath.cx> 29532 <86L26TA338475.4888541667@anonymous> "open (216.80.113.74) 21s failed A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond
after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. 21 sec"
>
> I whitelisted the above and included 69.119.201.0/24 in session logging for diagnostic purposes.
Fine by me, but probably not necessary.
>
> The only reason I whitelist IPs is to not do transaction level filtering.
> Those that do get rejected will receive a 554 error.
>
I'll let you know if I spot a 554 error.
Thanks for your help!
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
| |
| BiKiKii Admin 2005-05-03, 8:45 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 3 May 2005, Apple2Admin wrote:
>In article <1A131BC82EA0@bikikii.ath.cx>
>BiKiKii Admin <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
>Correct, but I'm still getting an error connecting to you.
>03 13:21:20[196014] Later 127.0.0.1 <Apple2Remailer@bigapple.dynalias.net>
><remail@bikikii.ath.cx> 29532 <86L26TA338475.4888541667@anonymous> "open
>(216.80.113.74) 21s failed A connection attempt failed because the connected
>party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established
>connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. 21 sec"
>
>
>Fine by me, but probably not necessary.
>
Subsequent to your reply I enabled logging of your IP range at the outer firewall and sent
out some remailer-* and Test-To messages.
Your server is not hitting my perimeter.
Ciao!
BiKiKii
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBQnfGm/Rwi/ QFFzi5AQE5sgf+MEOBnKUWcB4VvVAh5VC6lt1a50
nqUbD/
KivuffgyB97sPLniLEALHDv1mg9WslgdtoxiFFvk
DNfkTnS50wDLxPP5+1zULCBq
RCHzAtL9Qxb3dcAklobpL9/zUe1V7u/1eWLXqi5jIiYX1WKID88Rg1R+iMQ3Hv/f
1FnNw2B74hqBi0JFt1AnHVN1kGsnckHhA7Hrsf/yg4HNxN0kvz+24itfg5p6/t0H
jq1FK86oDJlV/kgxqiiUNoECzzpjOXTqla164j3/o9lmFSD/oxR3GjEAj/qjqb6Z
PKbGKLHZvRaiUlCR5pWKWcgGJq56yjl3ab+YfERX
sf6lHJK03LSQlQ==
=Evgu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Apple2Admin 2005-05-03, 8:45 pm |
| In article <1A98701D6D2F@bikikii.ath.cx>
BiKiKii Admin <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On 3 May 2005, Apple2Admin wrote:
>
> Subsequent to your reply I enabled logging of your IP range at the outer firewall and sent
> out some remailer-* and Test-To messages.
>
> Your server is not hitting my perimeter.
>
Then I'm stumped. I had a similar problem with Panta a while back,
but it cleared up by itself. Meanwhile, I'm still seeing the error
trying to send to your system and there are ~45 messages in the queue
waiting to be delivered. Oh well.
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
| |
| BiKiKii Admin 2005-05-06, 8:45 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 3 May 2005, Apple2Admin wrote:
>In article <1A98701D6D2F@bikikii.ath.cx>
>BiKiKii Admin wrote:
167.206.4.196 & 167.206.4.204
[vbcol=seagreen]
167.206.4.0/24
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
Once pings began return; trapped those from apple2, saw MTAs of srv.hcvlny.cv.net
>Then I'm stumped. I had a similar problem with Panta a while back,
>but it cleared up by itself. Meanwhile, I'm still seeing the error
>trying to send to your system and there are ~45 messages in the queue
>waiting to be delivered. Oh well.
>
apple2 ??????????31 1:08 00000000004+ 13.6%
apple2 ??????????31 1:08 00000000004+ 13.6%
Ciao!
BiKiKii
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBQnwaL/Rwi/ QFFzi5AQEMzgf+NP1z84V9qym5saelogsAnVU5id
rXOQRI
UJKoMfflYO4L63Z3VlN/+RLeyv4oSMZEv/HgswpnqtlIOkbE8CX/aLLhdkaqcnU6
Xvplz1j4zEy6yd8nMtGBn1gQ2amCPN8HBJUv7ZlV
iAsKKznrSHjxdj2TjkyEj+zq
8LJBfzbNc1iYKLi9pKgJeo93z/ezGbGIS8lyQQEd0KJiKPoA9dqdQRnY+jL1+zBX
b/ l4ZeL6Y1fZNRKyT5rCqT2OyXuyDpDl92ornwCITd
YDe0TaxSQB8+V4/A6W2aRs
fI+nZV2LQUQ+QUksuJ4IHRrSgTi4uvwlZjlHnK6j
DaKaMQ024PUQwQ==
=QDAS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Apple2Admin 2005-05-07, 2:45 am |
| In article <58A71833C6@bikikii.ath.cx>
BiKiKii Admin <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On 3 May 2005, Apple2Admin wrote:
>
> 167.206.4.196 & 167.206.4.204
>
>
> 167.206.4.0/24
>
>
> Once pings began return; trapped those from apple2, saw MTAs of srv.hcvlny.cv.net
Yes, I decided to gateway mail to your server via my ISPs mail server.
As long as they don't think I'm spamming, it'll be fine. The do impose
some limit on the number of emails you can send in any given time
period, but I'm hoping it will not be exceeded (fingers crossed).
So, for now, we're back in business.
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
|
|
|
|
|