|
| Anonymous said the following on 19/05/2005 11:36 pm:
> On Thu, 19 May 2005, news <nospamatall@iol.ie> wrote:
>
>
>
> For Christ's sake, NO!! Don't you have the intelligence and good judgement
> to recognize 1st class grade A FUD when you see it?
Generally, yes, but sometimes even a nutcase has a basis. The shame is
that they just state something without corroboration. It could be true,
or not. Thanks for all the edifying replies. This kind of thing should
be posted regularly for newbies. I mean something substantive that makes
such arguments completely unconvincing even to a newbie. I notice ofthen
the replies to such posts are merely scathing, which, while deserved,
don't help newbies.
> This living abortion has been in here trying to scare the newbies with this
> same old TIIIIIRED crap for almost 2 years now.
I know, I've watched it on and off now since 1996 or so. (not just this,
others as well). Could it be counteracted by a well-written regular post
or could such a post never be agreed upon?
> His whole silly "Polymorphing DLL" schtick has been laughed off the page so
> many times that he has decided to try another aproach. It is still
> laughable.
>
> It's probably a cop, or maybe a retired cop, who is just philosophically
> opposed to privacy. It is the stupid old argument "If you don't have
> anything to hide, you won't mind the government reading all of your
> correspondence"
>
>
|
|