Anonymous Servers - Re: Parsifal - True Remailer

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > May 2005 > Re: Parsifal - True Remailer





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Parsifal - True Remailer
admin@parsifal.ath.cx

2005-05-20, 5:46 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <KVSQ8IFC38492.7561574074@anonymous.poster>
nobody@See.Comments.Header (Italy Anonymous Remailer) wrote:
>
> In article <DG069P6P38492.477962963@si93kru1.poster>
> admin@parsifal.ath.cx wrote:
>
> All he's saying is that there should be a non-subjective method for
> determining abuse. Like the BI in the case of a flood,


That doesn't seem to accord with a belief in 'absolute' freedom of
speech, but, never mind, he's got the right idea.

> rather than you as
> a person sitting at the computer thinking "Hmmm, yep, it looks bad
> alright". Even if your policy was "I have received X number of
> complaints from identifiable denizens of alt.we.are.weenies so I'm
> going into full blocking mode", as long as X were an unchangeing
> determinate number it would be better than your current nebulous
> opinion-based policies.


I don't have any BI code, so I think I'll just put the remailer on as
laissez-faire basis as I can, with the execption of blocking forged
email addresses (but not if it's only the handle). In other words,
forgeries of joeblow@somewhere.com will be blocked, but forgeries of
Joe Blow will not.

Since I don't have any objective way to judge when a flood is a
flood, I'll just let the floods occur, as Alex DeJoode does, which
seems to be ok in any case.

This will have the immediate effect of making it much easier to run
the remailer, since I can probably use Panta's Dest-Block addition to
Reliable to automate blocking of forged email addresses, and can
ignore other complaints.

If things get sticky, I'll go to no custom 'from' headers, and if
things are still tough, I'll go to middleman.

I have the feeling that dyndns.org, being weak reeds, may end up
cancelling the account in any case, but I can then go somewhere else.

I feel much better about this whole remailer thing: it's less work
and I feel almost noble that I'm upholding freedom of speech.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQEVAwUBQo4Ra8+YNVItMjFNAQEwLQgAoUWmeFON
XmjNHEr/Ub3Z1t+flpG6NFNx
ruuC7Cq2Z2aJbol7acd5FU3S6c642jB8kJXhXXT4
XRrV0Ub/HgPY1wIkZqzmIZCi
cuiRfyJKLzBdqH2aMQMswgE4JT2nTXE179fw7u2p
C0uhEWz9r0jXuBwcBjq5kJVB
Dlp5vXCaCx/ kVBEn1syxgCiz+d438Ot7LMi87KE2crGumAJ1fJq
U2wBxeTHlSpg4
KoJ3TcvlmZQ1YxYgKLk+BhKgKnu9ZNHcAW6xioz2
FiiGqXI307JmnoXjOzk/Ej/B
j/ jiRuG2iXse86kk5qhvHthmtK3rnVVmaqz1WzkmhM
Z1WX6VBAvRgg==
=0gh8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




http://parsifal.ath.cx/miscx/ Remailer Information, Stats.



Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com