Anonymous Servers - Re: Parsifal - True Remailer

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > May 2005 > Re: Parsifal - True Remailer





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Parsifal - True Remailer
Anonymous

2005-05-20, 5:46 pm

On 20 May 2005, admin@parsifal.ath.cx wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>I don't have any BI code, so I think I'll just put the remailer on as
>laissez-faire basis as I can, with the execption of blocking forged
>email addresses (but not if it's only the handle). In other words,
>forgeries of joeblow@somewhere.com will be blocked, but forgeries of
>Joe Blow will not.
>
>Since I don't have any objective way to judge when a flood is a
>flood, I'll just let the floods occur, as Alex DeJoode does, which
>seems to be ok in any case.


You just couldn't resist a dig at your better, could you? DeJood is a
textbook example of what a remop should be, and you are a textbook example
of what a remop SHOULD NOT be.


>
>This will have the immediate effect of making it much easier to run
>the remailer, since I can probably use Panta's Dest-Block addition to
>Reliable to automate blocking of forged email addresses, and can
>ignore other complaints.
>
>
>I feel much better about this whole remailer thing: it's less work
>and I feel almost noble that I'm upholding freedom of speech.


You're not noble, you're a XXXX up. It is only a matter of time before you
crash and burn.










Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com