| Anonymous 2005-05-20, 5:46 pm |
| Your patronizing sarcastic answer stands as further proof of what an
XXXXXXX you truly are.
You really should consider growiing up a little bit before your next (13th?
17th?) attempt at running a remailer.
On 20 May 2005, admin@parsifal.ath.cx wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>In article <8KUW8E3938492.5509837963@anonymous.poster>
>Anonymous <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
>
>Not at all. Now that I see how Freedom of Speech is like a Day At The
>Beach, I realize that Mr. DeJoode is, as you say below, a textbook
>example of what a remop should be.
>
>And I intend to emulate him in pursuing Freedom of Speech by letting
>the floods roll on.
>
>The one thing I'm not quite sure about is how to handle what might be
>called 'stalking'. You know, where somebody uses the remailer to post
>his victim's home address and phone number, and pursues his victim
>through every newsgroup the victim posts to, following up with some
>scabrous rubbish, along with, of course, the home address, phone
>number, names of the victim's kids if he can find them out, etc.,
>etc.
>
>I used to get emails from these victims, asking, or demanding, that
>the messages be stopped, and I always was glad to put in as many
>blocks as were needed; but I realize now that that would be blocking
>the stalker's Freedom of Speech, so I have removed all existing
>blocks, and will ignore any demands for such blocks in the future.
>
>If you fellows who have more experience with Remailer Freedom of
>Speech have any advice in this area, I'm happy to listen, but,
>lacking that, I'll just ignore these pathetic wimp victims.
>
>
|