| Nomen Nescio 2005-06-15, 5:49 pm |
| On 14 Jun 2005, Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (JuneBug) wrote:
>I think those in alt.privacy and alt.privacy.anon-server should
>read this. I know you wont mind me passing it on to them for
>comments.
Cute, but a little fuzzy on the "details".
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>In article <AQ0Y663H38517.3975347222@anonymous>
>Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Barbara Perez) wrote:
>
>"Barbara Perez" <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote in
>message news:AQ0Y663H38517.3975347222@anonymous...
All mixmaster packets are the same size.
[vbcol=seagreen]
Not if sent "direct" to a remailer's own SMTP server. Wrong again.
[vbcol=seagreen]
>For
This may be true.
[vbcol=seagreen]
Absolutely false. The message is wrapped repeatedly in encryption before
sending. Once a remailer receives a message, all that it can do is strip
it's own layer of encryption, which will reveal yet another layer of
encrytpion, that it doesn't have the key for.
[vbcol=seagreen]
Not if someone used a sufficiently long chain.
[vbcol=seagreen]
>It has been donehere's an example of a
Trying to frighten newbies with techno babble. Whoever wrote this is a
liar, and a bad one. Probably works for a government agency/
[vbcol=seagreen]
No truth like a half-truth, eh, copper? Your ISP can NOT keylog your
machine (in the US). Neither can a NA see what you're doing in real time.
[vbcol=seagreen]
Here we go. Now I recognize the shit dribbling down your chin. Any minute
now you will begin yapping hysterically about a magical "polymorphing DLL"
and other such crap.
You are quite skilled at using implications, buzzwords and partial truths
to try to spread your FUD. You are vile, repulsive bully, and a coward.
Yep, with those credentials, you definitely must work for the FBI.
[vbcol=seagreen]
Spoken just like a cop. You sound like that fat-assed southern sherriff on
those cop reality shows who trys to make it appear that if you break the
law, they'll get ya.
Take the time? Like what, 10^17 years? 10 ^21 years?
[vbcol=seagreen]
Why does this bother you so much? Are you having trouble finding people
exercising free speech in a way that annoys you, Officer Nutsack?
References: <TEYTBLN638517.4900462963@anonymous>
|