Anonymous Servers - Mixminio Tester Message

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > June 2005 > Mixminio Tester Message





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Mixminio Tester Message
\[Anon\] anon user

2005-06-19, 8:45 pm

This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion
server at deuxpi.ca. If you do not want to receive anonymous
messages, please contact deuxpi-admin@deuxpi.ca. For more information
about anonymity, see http://mixminion.net.

-----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
Message-type: plaintext

Hello all:

This is a message from Mixminion Tester ARGON.

Seems that Mixminion is much better as typ I or typ II remailer systems.

I have send over 100 messages with a cain of 28 remailer:
Result is 97,9% of the messages where going over the remailer cain and, much
fester as over Mixmaster.

Regards,

ARGON



-----END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
Anonymous

2005-06-20, 5:47 pm

In article <20050619002512.685ACAB45C@deuxpi.ca>
"\[Anon\] anon user" <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all:
>
> This is a message from Mixminion Tester ARGON.
>
> Seems that Mixminion is much better as typ I or typ II remailer systems.
>
> I have send over 100 messages with a cain of 28 remailer:
> Result is 97,9% of the messages where going over the remailer cain and, much
> fester as over Mixmaster.
>
> Regards,
>
> ARGON


Ok, tell us your favorite mixminion routes, and explain why.

winnie ++*+++*++**+ 1:10:14 100.00%
psycocat **++++*+++++ 1:17:40 100.00%
chicago ++*+*+++++++ 1:20:54 100.00%
rufus +++++++*+*++ 1:21:18 100.00%
flutic ++++*+++++++ 1:23:40 100.00%
nowwhat *+++++++++++ 1:25:59 100.00%
KisanganiToo *++*++++++++ 1:27:41 100.00%
xbox ++++++++*+++ 1:28:26 100.00%
totoro2 ++++++*+++++ 1:28:48 100.00%
totoro1 ++++++++++++ 1:33:44 100.00%
rot26 ++++++++++++ 1:35:09 100.00%
pbox ++++++++++++ 1:37:58 100.00%
mordor +*++++++++++ 1:39:10 100.00%
cside ++++++++++++ 1:40:52 100.00%
snorky *+++++*+++++ 1:41:41 100.00%
noisebox +++++-++++++ 1:48:55 100.00%
laforge ++++++++++++ 2:10:40 100.00%
antani ++++++-+++++ 2:30:12 100.00%
grove ++++++++++++ 2:33:11 100.00%
PO ++++++++++++ 2:38:31 100.00%
deuxpi +++--+++++++ 3:21:12 100.00%
gurski .---+*+-++++ 4:32:14 100.00%
Tweep ++++*+++++++ 1:33:05 99.72%
frell +++-*+++ 1:43:36 98.67%
almery +*++++++++++ 1:20:33 98.46%
Rivendell ++++++++++++ 1:51:35 98.42%
nixon ++++*+++++++ 1:33:33 98.42%
paranion ++++++*+++++ 1:25:58 98.42%
wiredyne ++++++++++++ 1:36:20 98.42%
mercurio ++ ++++++*++ 1:39:36 94.64%
frell2 +++++++++++* 1:18:43 91.85%
lakshmi ++*+*++++++ 1:26:39 82.08%
dantooine ++ .--+ 7:48:03 69.00%
metacolo +++++*++*+ 1:15:44 68.63%
cassandra .__.-++++ 18:59:37 61.32%
Tonga *+** 1:01:39 11.20%
dendrite 99:59:59 0.00%
pbox2 99:59:59 0.00%
cybervalley 99:59:59 0.00%
Hume 99:59:59 0.00%
anize 99:59:59 0.00%

"You shouldn't trust Mixminion with your anonymity yet, for the following
reasons:
The code is under development. There may be unknown bugs that could
compromise your anonymity. (We do not know know of any such bugs.
In order to test the code, many servers are running in configurations that
could harm your anonymity. For example, some servers are configured to log
verbosely. Others are configured to use the "timed-pool" mixing algorithm
rather than the more robust "timed dynamic-pool" mixing algorithm. While
these configurations help us debug Mixminion, they also make it easier for
an eavesdropper or a compromised server to trace your messages. The final
Mixminion release will not support these configurations.
Some features that are necessary for high security, robustness, anonymity
are not yet implemented. These include:

Distributed directories. (The current centralized directory is a single
point of failure.)
Automatic generation of dummy messages.
Built-in network reliability testing ("pinging")."

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com