| Ari Silversteinn 2005-07-25, 5:47 pm |
|
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:05:53 +0200 (CEST), nobody@mixmaster.it wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> One VERY big problem with the whole concept of "probable cause" is that
> for the most part, probable cause is in the eye of the beholder.
Very much so.
> I don't know of any hard and fast rules that would define probable cause
> well enough to code a program that could make such determinations. Therefore
> probable cause is a source of a lot of un-provable trouble for people that
> don't deserve it and have in fact, done nothing wrong other than to piss
> someone off.
Very much so however in the cases in point, the copyrighted material, once
passed to another individual, without consent, cause is easily determined
by proof of that (potential) passing.
--
Drop the alphabet for email
|