|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > July 2005 > (No subject header)
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
(No subject header)
|
|
| Nomen Nescio 2005-07-25, 5:47 pm |
| ::
References: <20050725190130.3502C1708F@mail.cypherpunks.to>
Subject: Re: Any "Trivial" Unencrypted Remailers Left?
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Yes, but both of them will retain the email address you use to
> send to them.
> mail2news-20050725-alt.test@anon.lcs.mit.edu
> alt.test@bigapple.yi.org
I'm actually using the latter, through Dizum, which like all other
Cypherpunk remailers will not post with a GnuGP/Linux-encrypted
message, but I want one-step trivial anonymity, as with the old
alias_group.name@newsanon.ath.cx
remailer.
When I get to the bottom of this GnuPG/PGP incompatibility, this
will all go away...but in the meantime I need a less laborious way
of posting to Usenet with some anonymity. "nospam_" options leave
the "Reply-To: intact with most M2N gates, so that's no good.
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2005-07-26, 7:47 am |
| In <790a4dca75fce01cd75251583168ab1e@dizum.com>, nobody@dizum.com wrote:
>::
>References: <20050725190130.3502C1708F@mail.cypherpunks.to>
>Subject: Re: Any "Trivial" Unencrypted Remailers Left?
>
>
>
>
>I'm actually using the latter, through Dizum, which like all other
>Cypherpunk remailers will not post with a GnuGP/Linux-encrypted
>message, but I want one-step trivial anonymity, as with the old
>
>alias_group.name@newsanon.ath.cx
>
>remailer.
>
>When I get to the bottom of this GnuPG/PGP incompatibility, this
>will all go away...but in the meantime I need a less laborious way
>of posting to Usenet with some anonymity. "nospam_" options leave
>the "Reply-To: intact with most M2N gates, so that's no good.
you could use mixminion to send to a mail2news gateway, It's been getting more common since that win32 client got written.
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2005-07-27, 5:47 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Nomen Nescio wrote:
<s>
> When I get to the bottom of this GnuPG/PGP incompatibility, this
> will all go away...but in the meantime I need a less laborious way
> of posting to Usenet with some anonymity. "nospam_" options leave
> the "Reply-To: intact with most M2N gates, so that's no good.
If you are using GnuPG, you probably want to use the DH/DSS keys of the
remailers. Otherwise, add the --pgp2 option to your gpg.conf file
(without the dashes). That is what I do. (and be sure to install/compile
the IDEA.c plugin if you are encrypting to version 3 type RSA keys)
Thomas
- --
Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBQueOFQEP2l8iXKAJAQF25QMfYI67luge
8PRlsPXqnU0ks6OLzBSmOzm5
wgJGsN9zSfND1ZlPexJYoZoUsTh19lIV6aUtNwwO
rF69wza4Y8gNkU6DuQkaxEmT
BBLbe52DDmSn8K/1vHM3s8xRgA10WrlhFkMmrg==
=3ff6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|
|