Anonymous Servers - Did someone mention R Process (read the truth)

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > September 2005 > Did someone mention R Process (read the truth)





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Did someone mention R Process (read the truth)
me qsuser

2005-09-12, 5:53 pm

The truth about RProcess

RProcess was not an individual as most think. It's a code name for a team of programmers. They produced
programs like Potato, JBN1, JBN2, Reliable, and others. The anonymous community was grateful for an
easy way of secure communications, no more hand rolling and manual encrypting. They even released the
source code, proving how safe their programs were.(NOT) A group from the UK discovered discrepancies in
the coding. When RProcess was confronted the team was quickly disbanded. This fact, and that the FBI
runs most remailer today put you in great danger.

Warning on the use of PGP. Since the takeover by Symantec PGP has some very suspicious code. The risk
of using the program is way to high.

Some foolish individuals will mock the warning, but this is aimed at the serious minded.

(QS is best, forget the rest)
Download= http://www.quicksilvermail.net/
Tutorial= http://www.websamba.com/neone

Thrasher Remailer

2005-09-12, 5:53 pm

On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, me qsuser wrote:
>The truth about RProcess
>


** FUD ALERT ** ** FUD ALERT ** ** FUD ALERT **

>RProcess was not an individual as most think. It's a code name for a team
>of programmers. They produced programs like Potato, JBN1, JBN2, Reliable,
>and others. The anonymous community was grateful for an easy way of secure
>communications, no more hand rolling and manual encrypting. They even
>released the source code, proving how safe their programs were.(NOT) A
>group from the UK discovered discrepancies in the coding. When RProcess
>was confronted the team was quickly disbanded.
>


Cite please.

>This fact, and that the FBI
>runs most remailer today put you in great danger.
>


How could this be possible when most remailers are not within the
jurisdiction of the FBI.

>Warning on the use of PGP. Since the takeover by Symantec PGP has some
>very suspicious code.
>The risk of using the program is way to high.
>


You have been told before...

Symantec never has been involved with PGP.


>Some foolish individuals will mock the warning, but this is aimed at the
>serious minded.
>


Please tell use about the polymorphic DLL.

Anonymous

2005-09-12, 5:53 pm

You know that this person is a troll. They post the exact same posts
every month.

Why do you feed it?


Thrasher Remailer

2005-09-12, 5:53 pm

In <200509120349.j8C3nUHO007152@bluebottle-fe6.bluebottle.com>,
qsuser@notmail.com wrote:

...another pack of shit


speaking of which, isnt it interesting that "me qsuser" is mentioned by
Bluejay and all of a sudden it's back again.


BlueJay is not Eelbash, he's not even "me qsuser".

BlueJay is Frog-Admin's secret identity, his "Alter-Ego" if you will.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.



A.Melon

2005-09-12, 8:46 pm

In article <HFFIAN0838607.9581365741@anonymous.poster>
Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
> In <200509120349.j8C3nUHO007152@bluebottle-fe6.bluebottle.com>,
> qsuser@notmail.com wrote:
>
> ..another pack of shit
>
>
> speaking of which, isnt it interesting that "me qsuser" is mentioned by
> Bluejay and all of a sudden it's back again.
>
>
> BlueJay is not Eelbash, he's not even "me qsuser".
>
> BlueJay is Frog-Admin's secret identity, his "Alter-Ego" if you will.
>


You spelled trolling XXXXXXX wrong.
HTH










Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer

2005-09-13, 2:46 am

In article < dd4aaa24139e91b6a801750ab3cab4a5@melontr
affickers.com>
A.Melon <juicy@melontraffickers.com> wrote:
>
> In article <HFFIAN0838607.9581365741@anonymous.poster>
> Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
> You spelled trolling XXXXXXX wrong.
> HTH


I'm sure I had it right! Lemme try again...

B L U E J A Y

There! That's it, trolling ashole spelled correctly.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.



Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com