| Author |
smtp bayesian filter for mercury?
|
|
| Anonymous 2006-01-13, 9:21 pm |
| anybody know how to set it up?
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-01-13, 9:21 pm |
| In article <BT116NPJ38729.7510069444@anonymous>
Anonymous <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> wrote:
>
> anybody know how to set it up?
Is that you again EElbash? If it is I don't think it will help you much
because I think it's only good for incoming mail. You would be looking to
filter outbound, wouldn't you?
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-01-13, 9:21 pm |
| In article <BT116NPJ38729.7510069444@anonymous>
Anonymous <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> wrote:
>
> anybody know how to set it up?
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
SHUT UP EELBASH!
| |
| BiKiKii Admin 2006-01-13, 9:22 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 12 Jan 2006, Anonymous wrote:
>anybody know how to set it up?
>
What bayesian filter? There is no such built in function.
There is a third party daemon named "SpamWall" available.
However implementation in a remailing environment makes little sense.
Ciao!
BiKiKii
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBQ8WcAfRwi/QFFzi5AQEGxgf/WTeprtbaf+apa9UmGopv4rxms4YFDdS9
8VGg/ bysOTljyGTSZnGXeO7y4pkoUH998nbMe63GUOzsE
DcuHKUndPboDGpHthWO
ASctC6DfrV3EXF6PxqjWwGx6NbUEPf7wZMotfSH7
UlFl5OG3GyumObhmsNTmQoHY
g0C6SF54qfIC3Z8T0m2heUSn4y9J820mDFmQLwxo
XrVQqXttEPW+FythftLUj1hr
vB5M2QPk5bDdZD25SX7bQZAJoHE2nbfQ1u20fyX7
GE5fce9YV+OFqCo5VEVOhMiC
LmgNTmr1GWjOEll656KaL0kCmoRiTx6d5c0E49Bz
a8WK4WHurB5kdA==
=cQL1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Anonymous 2006-01-13, 9:22 pm |
| On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:48:13 +0000, Thrasher Remailer wrote:
> In article <BT116NPJ38729.7510069444@anonymous> Anonymous
> <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> wrote:
>
> Is that you again EElbash? If it is I don't think it will help you much
> because I think it's only good for incoming mail. You would be looking to
> filter outbound, wouldn't you?
Of course. If mercury's filters miss some spam, the Bayesian might catch
it. It seems like it should be a standard tool of every remailer operator,
but who knows?
One thing I find odd is that a filter only works on inbound. If there is a
stream of messages, why is it possible to filter only if the stream is
inbound?
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
| |
| Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer 2006-01-13, 9:22 pm |
| Anonymous <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> wrote:
> One thing I find odd is that a filter only works on inbound. If there is a
> stream of messages, why is it possible to filter only if the stream is
> inbound?
Mailservers can apply filters both ways.
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-01-13, 9:22 pm |
| In <REAYVHYH38730.3346527778@anonymous>, BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org wrote:
>On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:48:13 +0000, Thrasher Remailer wrote:
>
>
>Of course. If mercury's filters miss some spam, the Bayesian might catch
>it. It seems like it should be a standard tool of every remailer operator,
>but who knows?
Certainly not you Eeelbash!
>One thing I find odd is that a filter only works on inbound. If there is a
>stream of messages, why is it possible to filter only if the stream is
>inbound?
it's not odd at all. The filter works on inbound to protect the accounts that server deals with. outbound filtering is strictly off limits and pointless when remailer traffic is encrypted.... and even most exit traffic is encrypted.. the only common ex
ception to that is when exit traffic is headed to a mail2news gateway, and then the sender is well advised to choose her exit remailer very carefully. (i.e. NOT eelbash)
|
|
|
|