|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > January 2006 > ALERT!: Eelbash is pulling an Azerty!!!
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
ALERT!: Eelbash is pulling an Azerty!!!
|
|
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-01-16, 5:48 pm |
| proof you ask?
these announcemnets are just TOO co-incidental.
Message-ID: <pan.2006.01.16.17.00.05.613048@eelbash.org>:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eelbash was down for 6 hours today, from about 0600-1200 GMT, due to my
being asleep when an 'OK' button had to be clicked on.
No mail was lost, and the backup has been written out.
Sorry for any inconvenience caused by the delay.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDy9ClEC+g9Qawm6QRAm3BAJ9yjWp/Goxz3ukAyd0QFUmtL7Tr/QCfVVng
+SxRDQYMnmUheaVFm5EYV/I=
=387Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Message-ID: <1137429787.498052.248210@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dear all:
pyradic was down for approximately 6.5 hours today due to a hardware
failure located at the local infrastructure provider. Typically, no
mail would have been lost, but there is no assurance of that since
pyradic uses addresses from a dynamic IP pool. After the faulty
component was replaced, pyradic resumed operation immediately.
Traffic levels have since returned to normal.
Regards,
mas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFDy8xua0XYbu+ESwsRAk1OAKCR/4JoYQjSZR6MPD2ZWB6y64ayBQCgl/Dy
B1ajYIAtK8eHv9YqtfuwvT8=
=+XfO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-01-16, 8:46 pm |
| Thrasher Remailer wrote:
> proof you ask?
>
> these announcemnets are just TOO co-incidental.
we already knew pyradic and eelbash were the same junk
>
>
> Message-ID: <pan.2006.01.16.17.00.05.613048@eelbash.org>: -----BEGIN PGP
> SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Eelbash was down for 6 hours today, from about 0600-1200 GMT, due to my
> being asleep when an 'OK' button had to be clicked on.
>
> No mail was lost, and the backup has been written out.
>
> Sorry for any inconvenience caused by the delay. -----BEGIN PGP
> SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFDy9ClEC+g9Qawm6QRAm3BAJ9yjWp/Goxz3ukAyd0QFUmtL7Tr/QCfVVng
> +SxRDQYMnmUheaVFm5EYV/I=
> =387Y
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> Message-ID: <1137429787.498052.248210@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear all:
>
> pyradic was down for approximately 6.5 hours today due to a hardware
> failure located at the local infrastructure provider. Typically, no mail
> would have been lost, but there is no assurance of that since pyradic uses
> addresses from a dynamic IP pool. After the faulty component was
> replaced, pyradic resumed operation immediately. Traffic levels have since
> returned to normal.
>
> Regards,
> mas
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFDy8xua0XYbu+ESwsRAk1OAKCR/4JoYQjSZR6MPD2ZWB6y64ayBQCgl/Dy
> B1ajYIAtK8eHv9YqtfuwvT8=
> =+XfO
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-01-17, 2:47 am |
| >we already knew pyradic and eelbash were the same junk
but the question is why the deliberate difference in stories for why the
two were off line (ie one hardware and one the OK button)... He's really
starting to smell like a lying little piece of shit (in addition to his
many other failings).
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-01-17, 2:48 am |
| In <002ed1c78d33c3b33f81007b18109515@pseudo.borked.net>, nobody@pseudo.borked.net wrote:
>Thrasher Remailer wrote:
>
>
>we already knew pyradic and eelbash were the same junk
Well I guess I was asleep that day. (good thing I'm not a remop) and missed the postings about it.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, I'm thankfull pyradic is middlman and will never be chosen as an exit.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>.
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-01-17, 2:48 am |
| TwistyCreek wrote:
> but the question is why the deliberate difference in stories for why the
> two were off line (ie one hardware and one the OK button)... He's really
ROTFL!
You're trying to reason the unreasonable... apply logic to the actions of
an insane person.
But what the hell!
I'd wager Helen was just coherent enough for a few seconds that she
realized she busted herself on some sort of little "secret spy kitty"
program she wrote to monitor and filter traffic when she posted the OK
button stupidity.
Coherency being a fleeting state for Helen, she quickly forgot we already
knew about pyradic being her evil spawn too, and decided it would be a
brilliant thing to make up some other stupid story to cover her wide XXX
on that remailer.
I loved the 30 minute time difference by the way, what a hoot! 
| |
| Anonymous 2006-01-17, 2:48 am |
| In article <c72a46726a5a02cd95b7fc5e82406039@pseudo.borked.net>
Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>
> I'd wager Helen was just coherent enough for a few seconds that she
> realized she busted herself on some sort of little "secret spy kitty"
> program she wrote to monitor and filter traffic when she posted the OK
> button stupidity.
>
> Coherency being a fleeting state for Helen, she quickly forgot we already
> knew about pyradic being her evil spawn too, and decided it would be a
> brilliant thing to make up some other stupid story to cover her wide XXX
> on that remailer.
What is with all of this calling him Helen?
Helen was the name of the person at the company that registered the
domain. He is not Helen. Go read your whois again.
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-01-17, 5:47 pm |
| Anonymous wrote:
> In article <c72a46726a5a02cd95b7fc5e82406039@pseudo.borked.net> Borked
> Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>
> What is with all of this calling him Helen?
>
> Helen was the name of the person at the company that registered the
> domain. He is not Helen. Go read your whois again.
Now Helen, your identity was put together nicely for us. There was even
links to the pictures of your cats ferChristsakes. The treadles.ca web
site, the business name, your phone number, everything points directly at
you. You ARE the wife you were lying about when you claimed someone was
complaining about your web site. You even registered one of your remailer
accounts in a fake name that was partially yours. Not very bright.
|
|
|
|
|