Anonymous Servers - drsnoid stats dead?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > January 2006 > drsnoid stats dead?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author drsnoid stats dead?
Anonymous

2006-01-27, 9:03 pm

Usually he updates his results.txt file once every two weeks. It
hasn't been updated in nearly a month now. Anyone know if the service
has been stopped, or if he's just busy?
Anonymous

2006-01-27, 9:03 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <ca4039abef30dfd2f3cea9b8fe4cbf49@anon.bananasplit.info>
Anonymous <nobody@invalid.org> wrote:
>
> Usually he updates his results.txt file once every two weeks. It
> hasn't been updated in nearly a month now. Anyone know if the service
> has been stopped, or if he's just busy?


No, I'm still doing my thing.
Last results were posted the 13th of Jan
<NYGBLEK338731.2037384259@anonymous.poster> and I'm in the process of
gathering up new results as we speak, for posting possibly tomorrow (I'm
waiting to see if dizum comes back to life).

drsnoid

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQA/AwUBQ9o/q5c5FWApPF04EQI6cACg/KV9lJwCMTFxbcDqPN/j1iMMsVoAoLpv
UF7bqaR4g6R7uRGVabpRpdjK
=xG4U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.



George Orwell

2006-01-27, 9:03 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <ca4039abef30dfd2f3cea9b8fe4cbf49@anon.bananasplit.info>
Anonymous <nobody@invalid.org> wrote:
>
> Usually he updates his results.txt file once every two weeks. It
> hasn't been updated in nearly a month now. Anyone know if the service
> has been stopped, or if he's just busy?


Ack! I just discovered why you were concerned. I had neglected to update
the date on the results.txt file. Corrected now, and look for a new one
very soon. Sorry.

drsnoid

P.S. A nifty new version of gatepick should be out soon, also.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQA/AwUBQ9pFSJc5FWApPF04EQL/vACeNO8zLvb9nCoTYPLb8V6axwxTudkAoIzn
xnG6mKdE//k6V/oe4uThlfHA
=CF24
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Anonymous

2006-01-27, 9:03 pm

In article < 7e1efe05ffaf464635b8d091bcf7fdcf@mixmast
er.it>
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
> Ack! I just discovered why you were concerned. I had neglected to update
> the date on the results.txt file. Corrected now, and look for a new one
> very soon. Sorry.


No problem. I usually download it from your site, and as it still said
31-DEC-05 I assumed it hadn't been updated.

Good to know you're still updating it. It's very useful information
which has improved my post reliability a lot. Thanks!

> P.S. A nifty new version of gatepick should be out soon, also.


Excellent news!
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com